2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allograft Nephrectomy: A Single-Institution, 10-Year Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies were heterogeneous with varying policies regarding the removal of failed grafts. In a large USRDS cohort (1995–2003), nephrectomy was performed in 27% of 15 400 patients with late graft failure (graft survival >1 year) . In our cohort, most graft nephrectomies were performed shortly after graft failure (88% within 1 year), which is in agreement with findings in other studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These studies were heterogeneous with varying policies regarding the removal of failed grafts. In a large USRDS cohort (1995–2003), nephrectomy was performed in 27% of 15 400 patients with late graft failure (graft survival >1 year) . In our cohort, most graft nephrectomies were performed shortly after graft failure (88% within 1 year), which is in agreement with findings in other studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The only difference observed between the outcomes after the two techniques was mean hospital length of stay, which was 13.8 days in the EC group and 7.6 days in the IC group ( p = 0.01). Smaller studies comparing the IC and EC techniques have not shown a clear association between technique and blood loss [ 35 37 ].…”
Section: Outcomes After Gnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that did not take into account the timing of GN showed that GN was associated with an increase in detectable HLA-Ab and new DSA [ 46 50 ]. Analyses comparing IC and EC GN on allosensitisation were unable to detect a difference in PRA score between the two techniques [ 35 , 37 ].…”
Section: Outcomes After Gnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A korai és késői csoport össze-hasonlításakor az indikációs kört más kutatásokkal egyetértésben [2,10,18] alapvetően eltérőnek találtuk. A korai nephrectomiák leggyakrabban artériás keringési zavar miatt történtek, amit egyenlő arányban követett a vénás és kombinált keringési zavar, valamint hiperakut és akut rejectio.…”
Section: áBra Graftectomizált éS Nem Graftectomizált Betegek Túléléséunclassified
“…Bár a korai graftectomiák esetében a posztoperatív szövődmények és mortalitás valamivel magasabb arányát észleltük, mint a késői csoportban, a különbség nem volt szignifikáns, ellentétben Sun és mtsai [10], illetve Freitas és mtsai [18] közléseivel. Viszont más szerzők (Mazzucchi és mtsai) inkább a késői graftectomiák után szá-moltak be magasabb szövődményarányról, amelyet a ké-sői műtétek technikailag nehezebb voltával magyaráztak [6].…”
Section: áBra Graftectomizált éS Nem Graftectomizált Betegek Túléléséunclassified