2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allogeneic Transplantation for Patients With Advanced Myelofibrosis: Splenomegaly and High Serum LDH are Adverse Risk Factors for Successful Engraftment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed comparable survival outcomes (3-year OS of 85.4% versus 92.9% and FFS of 82.7% versus 92.9%) in the PR/SD and CR groups, with poor performance (ECOG scores = 3) being an adverse factor. Previous reports also observed that poor performance affected outcomes after transplantation [23,[32][33][34]. These results suggest that reducing the pretransplantation delay may be beneficial for transplant patients because of better performance status and milder infections, although the small number of cases was a limitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…We observed comparable survival outcomes (3-year OS of 85.4% versus 92.9% and FFS of 82.7% versus 92.9%) in the PR/SD and CR groups, with poor performance (ECOG scores = 3) being an adverse factor. Previous reports also observed that poor performance affected outcomes after transplantation [23,[32][33][34]. These results suggest that reducing the pretransplantation delay may be beneficial for transplant patients because of better performance status and milder infections, although the small number of cases was a limitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The significance of splenomegaly may vary among different indications for stem cell transplantation. Most of the evidence linking splenomegaly and rejection in stem cell transplant comes from myelofibrosis [33][34][35][36]. It also has been described in other conditions such as acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and chronic myeloid leukemia [22,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings were reflected in a separate retrospective analysis of 156 patients receiving all-HSCT in which no significant correlation between pretransplant sLDH levels and time to engraftment of PLT and/or WBC was found (19). Conversely, Gergis et al reported that pretransplant sLDH levels above 487 IU/L were negatively associated with PLT engraftment (p= 0.04) in patients with advanced myelofibrosis undergoing allo-HSCT (23). We believe that the inconsistencies described among studies regarding the effect of pre-transplant sLDH levels and engraftment may be a result of varying definitions of what constitutes PLT and WBC engraftment, population heterogeneity, disease diagnosis, and cut-off points for what is considered low or high sLDH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%