Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children and Adolescents with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Brazil: A Multicentric Retrospective Study
Abstract:The survival rates of children with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) range from 60% to 70% in high-income countries. The corresponding rate for Brazilian children with AML who undergo HSCT is unknown. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 114 children with AML who underwent HSCT between 2008 and 2012 at institutions participating in the Brazilian Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Working Group. At transplant, 38% of the children were in first compl… Show more
“…Other studies from the same public institution where our patients came from also reported long hospitalization time and long time between diagnosis and HSCT (>12 months) for patients with low socioeconomic status (Paz et al, 2018;Pitombeira et al, 2013;Silla et al, 2009). Since the limitation in the number of hospital beds for performing HSCT in Brazil, patients with indications for transplantation and with a donor located remain on a waiting list until bed availability (Rodrigues et al, 2020). Besides the order of arrival, this list considers prioritization criteria such as age and disease type (Brazil, 2017).…”
Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate treatment costs of Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at a reference center in Brazil. Methods: The study population consisted of patients from the Unified Health System HSCT who underwent HSCT in southern Brazil between 2016 and 2019. Costs were measured using a micro-costing approach, based on Time-Driven Activity-based Costing (TDABC) adapted for economic studies in health and included the following steps: definition of the research question, structured data collection, and statistical analysis of results. Results: The total cost of HSCT was $155,110 ($92,794 – $249,146 USD). Matched unrelated donor HSCT was more expensive than matched related donor HSCT. The major cost factors involve post-ransplant complications, mainly the occurrence of infections. Concerning cost composition, exams and procedures represent the largest expense in HSCT (45%). Conclusion: These estimates could be applicable to further evaluations for HSCT cost-effectiveness and help healthcare decision-makers in middle-income countries
“…Other studies from the same public institution where our patients came from also reported long hospitalization time and long time between diagnosis and HSCT (>12 months) for patients with low socioeconomic status (Paz et al, 2018;Pitombeira et al, 2013;Silla et al, 2009). Since the limitation in the number of hospital beds for performing HSCT in Brazil, patients with indications for transplantation and with a donor located remain on a waiting list until bed availability (Rodrigues et al, 2020). Besides the order of arrival, this list considers prioritization criteria such as age and disease type (Brazil, 2017).…”
Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate treatment costs of Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at a reference center in Brazil. Methods: The study population consisted of patients from the Unified Health System HSCT who underwent HSCT in southern Brazil between 2016 and 2019. Costs were measured using a micro-costing approach, based on Time-Driven Activity-based Costing (TDABC) adapted for economic studies in health and included the following steps: definition of the research question, structured data collection, and statistical analysis of results. Results: The total cost of HSCT was $155,110 ($92,794 – $249,146 USD). Matched unrelated donor HSCT was more expensive than matched related donor HSCT. The major cost factors involve post-ransplant complications, mainly the occurrence of infections. Concerning cost composition, exams and procedures represent the largest expense in HSCT (45%). Conclusion: These estimates could be applicable to further evaluations for HSCT cost-effectiveness and help healthcare decision-makers in middle-income countries
“…11 In a study with Brazilian HSCT centers for children, adolescents, and young adults, OS and EFS in 4 years were 47% and 40%, respectively. 12 Brazilian outcomes of HSCT in children with AML appear to be inferior to those reported in the United States and Europe. A report by Bitan et al from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) on 141 pediatric patients with AML who underwent the transplant in CR1 showed a 5-year PFS of 54% after myeloablative conditioning 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The results of transplants using related, unrelated (matched or partially matched, with a greater than a 8/10 HLA-match) and haploidentical donors are very similar in AML, with no significant difference between type of donor, whether in overall survival, incidence of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) 12,19 . In children, bone marrow is preferable in comparison to peripheral blood (PB) as stemcell source, given the higher extensive chronic GVHD and transplant-related mortality with the use of peripheral blood stem cells 20,21 .…”
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents 15%–20% of acute leukemias in children, and the risk of treatment failure is based on genetic risk and response to therapy1-4. Although the initial remission rate exceeds 90%, more than 30-40% of children with AML die of refractory/relapsed disease or treatment-related toxicity5. The best therapeutic results are achieved by integrating intensive chemotherapy, optimal supportive care, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) adapted to each patient’s risk of relapse6–9. In 2020, the Brazilian Group for Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplantation of the Brazilian Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SBTMO) and the Brazilian Society for Pediatric Oncology (SOBOPE) convened a task force to provide general guidance on HSCT for childhood AML to provide evidence-based guidance for the appropriate management of this disease.
“…A higher relapse incidence (43%) was published by de Melo Rodrigues and cols. 8 when they analyzed 114 AML patients that received MSD (49), MUD (59) and haploidentical (6) HCT. The 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) for all cohort was 40%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in immunomodulatory interventions and maintenance approaches, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs), have benefit selected patients. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Pulsipher et al reported 9 , in a multicenter prospective study, risk factors and timing of relapse after allogeneic transplantation in a pediatric population diagnosed with ALL. They concluded that there is a window between day +55 and day +100 to 200 when most high-risk patients have not relapsed yet and that this population could benefit from measures to avoid relapse at that time.…”
The best way to manage acute leukemia relapse after HCT is to prevent it, buying time for GVL with immunomodulation and, if no GVHD between days +60 and + 90, prophylactic DLI can be indicate for very high or high risk patients. Short-term low dose of cyclosporine or methotrexate can add safety to pro-DLI, particularly after mismatched or unrelated transplantation. Maintenance with imatinib or dastinib, recommended for Ph-positive ALL, with sorafenib, for FLT3-ITD AML, or azacitidine, for myelodysplastic syndrome patients, can be effective in reducing relapse rates. However, target agent maintenance can add toxicity, depends on patient adherence and demands physician experience to know when is safe to start, how adjust the dose according individual tolerance after transplant and to detect undesirable drug interactions. The second step to avoid hematological relapse is preemptive approach guided by measurable residual disease or mixed chimerism. In patients off immunosuppression, chemotherapy followed by DLI is a useful strategy, and if no response, interferon alpha can be associated to enhance GVL. Target-specific agents can be start at this point either. After relapse, antigen-directed therapy with blinatumumab for CD19 ALL, inotuzumab for CD22 ALL are excellent options to induce MRD negativity and facilitate HCT. Disadvantages of new immunotherapies are: high incidence of VOD with inotuzumab and gemtuzumab; lower response in patients with high leukemia burden or concurrent extramedullary relapse; necessity of consolidation with HCT after a bridging therapy with BiTE and probably with CAR-T cell therapy also. It is important to realize that if remission after chemotherapy is associated with the development of GVHD, then there may be limited benefit (and possibly harm) in consolidating with any kind of cellular therapy. However, for patients who achieved remission without GVHD, either DLI or second transplant can be recommend. Further studies are necessary to determine at which point each strategy might yield the best results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.