2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-021-02137-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allocation of carbon emission quotas in Chinese provinces based on Super-SBM model and ZSG-DEA model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to integrate energy, carbon emissions, and economic growth into the framework of efficiency analysis, we first need to construct a production possibility set that contains both desired and undesired outputs [7,8]. In the literature, normal products are often defined as desired outputs, and pollutants emitted as byproducts of industrial production, such as waste gas and waste water, are defined as undesired outputs [9,10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to integrate energy, carbon emissions, and economic growth into the framework of efficiency analysis, we first need to construct a production possibility set that contains both desired and undesired outputs [7,8]. In the literature, normal products are often defined as desired outputs, and pollutants emitted as byproducts of industrial production, such as waste gas and waste water, are defined as undesired outputs [9,10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, it is common to consider the negative impact of undesired output on economic growth and introduce the undesired output and expected output into the model research by using slacks-based model (SBM). For example, Chen Fang et al used "carbon emissions" as single nonexpected output index to measure the green economic efficiency of all provinces in China [12]. Xia Yongqiu et al used the SBM to calculate China's green economic efficiency by taking the industrial three wastes emission index as multiple undesired outputs and discovered that the national average annual green economic efficiency was 0.7, yielding an inverted U-shaped evolution process [13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some scholars use the carbon emission efficiency calculated by the input-output DEA model as the standard. It is too simple to measure the carbon emission efficiency with a single factor, so in order to measure the carbon emission efficiency of each region more comprehensively, the SBM model is established to calculate the carbon emission efficiency (Chen et al 2021). Referring to Qin et al (2017) and Zhou et al (2017), more emission quotas were allocated to provinces with good emission efficiency performance.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%