Allocating weightage to sustainability criteria’s for performance assessment of group housing developments: Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

Bhyan, Parul; Shrivastava, Bhavna; Kumar, Nand

doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105684

Cited by 11 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Establishing several performance benchmarks using conventional LCC [54][6] and social sustainability is the least dimension to be assessed through life cycle stages in literature [38][61]. In the literature there are very few studies suggesting a methodology for establishing benchmarks values comprehensively for both qualitative and quantitative criteria's for sustainability assessment of buildings considering all life cycle stages [12] [13]. Literature includes, this study discusses that benchmarking should be processed for each dimension including each key performance indicator, and a measure system should be established using Statistical process monitoring theory [41].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Overall, the novelty of the current methodological development lies rst in the modeling of the LCT approach to sustainability assessment of group housing projects in the Indian scenario, second in its scoring mechanisms that produce a nal sustainability result, and third in its viability for both practitioners and non-practitioners to practice the scoring system. Impact categories and criteria's were scrutinized based on existing literature to concentrate solely on relevant hotspots [13].…”

Section: Phase Ii: Establishing a Scoring Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A literature review and analysis of standards, values, and regional guidelines led to the establishment of 56 sustainability sub-criteria's that affect group housing projects in India's composite climatic zone. Group housing sustainability assessment systems currently include 16 new criteria's, which have been already reported in [13]. Also, a comparison between important sustainability criteria's and the existing GBRS is reported [10].…”

Section: Establishing Bmmin-bmmax Scoring Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For high rise group housing Projects, there should be a thorough site selection process with predetermined criteria's, such as scale of housing, zoning considerations, and location (proximity to services) [13]. The primary objective of the criteria "site selection" is to encourage sustainable sites for such large projects, which can then effectively reduce the fossil fuels consumed during construction.…”

Section: Site Selection In the Pre-construction Stagementioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study's main focus is on the residential sector, and it assesses methodologies used for benchmarking the criteria used in the published literature on group housing projects and limitations [13]. GBRS systems are been part of the global scenario for sustainability assessment as shown in Fig.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Establishing Benchmarks for Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of sustainability criteria’s for performance assessment of group housing projects: in India

bhyan,

Shrivastava,

Kumar

2024

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The construction industry needs a systematic, apparent sustainability assessment methodology that provides methodical, unambiguous direction on the way to sustainable development. The current sustainability rating systems' shortcomings include the exclusion of post-occupancy assessments, the absence of life-cycle assessments, and the imposition of certification additional costs. Focusing on constructions in India, the goal of the current study is to set benchmarks to investigate the influence of each criterion on sustainability across the building life cycle phases for qualitative and quantitative assessment, and min-max scores for significant sustainability criteria's. Benchmarking standards include the criteria’s importance and appraisal to assess the best and worst sustainable performance of high rise group housing projects (proposed and existing) within building life cycle stages. The sustainability criteria’s and associated score system are established after an exhaustive assessment of the existing literature review and existing Green Building Rating Systems specific to high-rise group housing projects. Subsequently, the methodology includes the Life cycle thinking approach for sustainability assessment in group housing projects, and establishing scoring system, ensuring viability for practitioners and non-practitioners. The findings demonstrate the importance of taking into account existing byelaws, standards, and guidelines and the inclusion of stakeholder participation (users) in sustainability assessment frameworks in India.

show abstract