Allison, Guyer, and Kant on the “Neglected Alternative Charge”

Kant's Neglected Alternative: Neither Neglected nor An Alternative

“…Kanterian (, 263–288) and Specht (, 514–534) must also be singled out for filling an important need, as they reintroduce us to Trendelenburg's point of view at a level of detail often neglected by Kant scholars (and by the present author). These can fruitfully be supplemented with other recent or current studies of the problem itself: Adair‐Toteff (, 131–148); Allais (, 47–75); Allison (, 313–321, especially 313–315; , 102–114, especially 111–114; , 3–26; 2004, 118–132, especially 128–132; , 111–124); Ameriks (, 329–342, especially 335–337); Bennett (, 22–27); Bird (, 173–178; , 486–499; , 289–300); Bonaccini (, 107–120); Breitenbach (, 137–148); Buroker (, 93–100; , 36–72, 305–309); DeLong (, 13–26); Disalle (, 55–79); Falkenstein (, 265–283; , 289–309, 310–333, 334–355; , 140–153); Gardner (, 57–74); Gram (, 207–210); Guyer (, 333–383); Hanna (, 95–105, 105–119, especially 105–113); Herissone‐Kelly (, 269–282); Hogan (, 49–63; , 355–382); Insole (, 608–638); Katz (, 91–100); Keller (, 217–234, especially 224–228); Kemp Smith (, 112–114); Kitcher (, 599–608); Körner (, 37–39); Kroon (, 165–181); Langton (, 7–14, 15–47); Paton (, 171–175, 180–181); Pippin (, 54–87, 188–215); Rescher (, 289–299); Rogerson (, 271–286); Rosefeldt (, 755–764); Rosenberg (, 61–87); Scott‐Taggart (, 171–209, especially 184); Senderowicz (, 97–110, 135–157); Setiya (, 63–88); Strawson (, 47–71, 235–273); Thompson (, 33–48); Van Cleve (, 134–171); Walker (, 821–843); Werkmeister (, 301–311).…”