2016
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alliance‐building Process as Inhibiting Factor for SME International Alliances

Abstract: This study examines how the alliance-building process affects the intention to enter into international alliances in the case of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). From a psychological perspective (Perceived Behavioural Control), the authors analyse the alliance-building process as an inhibitor of the international collaboration intention, considering to what extent the experience affects the intention of the partners involved. The study explores these hypotheses based on a sample of 220 Spanish SMEs. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(275 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior evidence shows that immigration spurs entrepreneurship (Fairlie and Lofstrom, 2015) and cross-border investment flows (Iriyama, Li and Madhavan, 2010;Madhavan and Iriyama, 2009). By contrast, legal barriers, such as barriers to immigration and trade, hurt the impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth (Cumming, Johan and Zhang, 2014;Zahra, 2014) since there is less alliance building with international entrepreneurs and their investors (Arranz, Arroyabe and de Arroyabe, 2016;Siegel and Wright, 2015) and a worsening of entrepreneurial gover-nance and investment outcomes in the face of legal and institutional constraints (Cumming, Schmidt and Walz, 2010;Li and Zahra, 2012). The first look at evidence specific to Brexit is consistent with this literature (Schiereck and Tielmann, 2016), such that UK and continental European firms were both hurt by Brexit, and UK firms were more negatively affected than their continental counterparts.…”
Section: Brexit and International Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior evidence shows that immigration spurs entrepreneurship (Fairlie and Lofstrom, 2015) and cross-border investment flows (Iriyama, Li and Madhavan, 2010;Madhavan and Iriyama, 2009). By contrast, legal barriers, such as barriers to immigration and trade, hurt the impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth (Cumming, Johan and Zhang, 2014;Zahra, 2014) since there is less alliance building with international entrepreneurs and their investors (Arranz, Arroyabe and de Arroyabe, 2016;Siegel and Wright, 2015) and a worsening of entrepreneurial gover-nance and investment outcomes in the face of legal and institutional constraints (Cumming, Schmidt and Walz, 2010;Li and Zahra, 2012). The first look at evidence specific to Brexit is consistent with this literature (Schiereck and Tielmann, 2016), such that UK and continental European firms were both hurt by Brexit, and UK firms were more negatively affected than their continental counterparts.…”
Section: Brexit and International Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although literature has debated vastly on diverse benefits of alliances for engaging firms, these benefits could be summarized in superior competitive position in international markets. Despite the advantages offered by international strategic alliances, however empirical evidence shows few successful alliances (Bierly & Gallagher, 2007;Arranz, Arroyabe, & de Arroyabe, 2016), especially from developing economies context (Li & Ferreira, 2008). EJBE 2017, 10(20)…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is supposed that even outstanding strategic alliance management may not be sufficient to overcome poor partner selection (Cummings & Holmberg, 2012). According to Arranz, Arroyabe, and de Arroyabe (2016), the alliance cooperation itself is not a guarantee of successful entry in international markets and searching, choosing and coordinating of partners has a pivotal role in attainment of desired goals.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main reason for strategic alliances is to share resources, costs and risks in operations (Arranz et al, 2016), in order to achieve mutual benefit among their participants (Piguave, 2016, Ariño, 2008, and to improve their capacity for competition and innovation. Strategic alliances also offer business opportunities and are fundamental because creativity is exploited due to the scarcity of economic resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%