Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfragen

Jacob, Rüdiger; Eirmbter, Willy H.

doi:10.1515/9783486793048

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The linguistic realization is based on cognitive psychology research. According to recent literature such as Jacob, Eirmbter [137] or Schnell, Hill, and Esser [138], it is decisive for the success of the questionnaire, in addition to the individual skills of the creator, to use implementation advice (for example in the form of checklists) [139]. This is realized by observing the process steps postulated by Kallus [140], as these make it possible to develop a questionnaire that, on the one hand, draws a complete picture of the area under investigation and, on the other hand, realizes a psychometrically tested survey instrument with defined quality, for example, realized in the standard systems (e.g., ISO 10075 or DIN 33430) (Kallus, 2010 [140]).…”

Section: Evaluation Of the Patternsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Best Business Models for the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Sector: Patterns for Innovation

Schroedel

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mankind’s consumption exceeds our natural resources, so among other things, the development of new business models at the company level is needed. This paper aims to generate systematic business model innovations in the field of fast-moving consumer goods using business model patterns to foster sustainability. Based on a literature search, the most relevant patterns for the industry are identified as part of a multi-stage selection process that is based on the value generated by the patterns. Expert surveys are the central instrument for data collection. Here, the connection of the patterns to the strategy is central. The result is a list of relevant patterns, which includes patterns from completely external industries. This is the first evaluation of its kind, which shows that patterns focusing only on the circular economy are not enough to succeed and, therefore, break the scientific paradigm.

show abstract