2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alleviation of post‐contingency overloads by SOCP based corrective control considering TCSC and MTDC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the present version of the DIG-OPF model has not yet considered these devices, in theory, they can be added to the algorithm, which requires adding new equations and constraints to the problem. Some existing studies, e.g., [40]- [43], give useful guidance on how to model and add these devices. Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Dig-opf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the present version of the DIG-OPF model has not yet considered these devices, in theory, they can be added to the algorithm, which requires adding new equations and constraints to the problem. Some existing studies, e.g., [40]- [43], give useful guidance on how to model and add these devices. Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Dig-opf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, there are plenty of approaches to alleviating transmission line overloads in grid operations, such as load shedding [37], generation re-dispatch [38], line switching [39], and flexible power flow adjustment of FACTS devices [40]- [43]. In particular, FACTS devices are very effective in mitigating transmission line overloads in both HVAC and HVDC networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the constraints (33) and (34), the determined preventive power output PG * i,0 is a constant provided by results of the master problem in the current iteration. After solving the subproblems (31)-(36), the corrective power flow distribution is obtained and temperature variations after t 2 can be quantified by Equations (16) and (19).…”
Section: Subproblem 1 (Corrective Control Feasibility Check)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NFC and NTC indicate the number of contingenies which cannot pass the corrective control feasibility check and the line thermal rating check. for each k ∈ [1, N K ] do 6: solve the subproblem 1 consisting of Equations (31)-(36); 7: if ∑ s i,k + r i,k = 0 then 8: generate the Benders cut by Equation (37) and return it into th master problem; 9: obtain the power flow distribution F k ; NFC = NFC + 1; for each k ∈ [1, N K ] do 14: for each line l operating in the contingency k do 15: calculate the Tc max l,kp and t equal l,kp by Equations (1)- (19) and (39), repsectively; 16: if Tc max l,kp > Tc l,Rate then 17: add line l into the set L k 18: end if 19: end for 20: if L k = φ then 21: NTC = NTC + 1; sumdTc = 0; 22: for each l ∈ L k do 23: sumdTc = sumdTc + (Tc max l,kp − Tc l,Rate ); 24: end for 25: for each i ∈ [1, N G ] do 26: sumpd i = 0; 27: for each l ∈ L k do 28: calculate the partial derivative…”
Section: Subproblem 2 (Line Thermal Rating Check)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation