2018
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2017.0168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alleviating the Plunging-In Bias, Elevating Strategic Problem-Solving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second case differs from the first in that our industry partner clearly espouses a problem but provides insufficient information to solve it. This requires teams to search for suitable information, evaluate their sources' legitimacy, and engage deeply in understanding the problem (see Bhardwaj et al, 2018) before deploying analysis and solution development. The second case is more difficult in terms of assignment structure, and it poses considerably higher requirements for the teams' organizational enactment and sensemaking (Maitlis & Christianson, 2014).…”
Section: Overview Of the Learning Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second case differs from the first in that our industry partner clearly espouses a problem but provides insufficient information to solve it. This requires teams to search for suitable information, evaluate their sources' legitimacy, and engage deeply in understanding the problem (see Bhardwaj et al, 2018) before deploying analysis and solution development. The second case is more difficult in terms of assignment structure, and it poses considerably higher requirements for the teams' organizational enactment and sensemaking (Maitlis & Christianson, 2014).…”
Section: Overview Of the Learning Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To shift this perspective, organizations need to engage in problem solving rather than just decision making. Problem solving involves choosing appropriate issues and framing a situation in a way that may challenge existing assumptions and cognitive biases to identify novel possibilities, while decision making is choosing the best possibility (Bhardwaj, Crocker, Sims, & Wang, 2018). Digital Equipment was able to make decisions but unable to properly frame and reframe the problem.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many prepared cases, for example, are written toward a specific conclusion or focus. Some unfortunately are written in ways that explicitly or implicitly frame the core problem for the students which then induces a plunging-in bias that can undermine thoughtful analysis (Bhardwaj, Crocker, Sims, & Wang, 2018). We have also found that dated, prepared cases induce some students to do their own research in an attempt to discover what the firm has done regarding key issues and to what effects.…”
Section: The Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%