2016
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alleviating managerial dilemmas in human‐capital‐intensive firms through incentives: Evidence from M&A legal advisors

Abstract: Research summary: We examine how human‐capital‐intensive firms deploy their human assets and how firm‐specific human capital interacts with incentives to influence this deployment. Our empirical context is the UK M&A legal market, where micro‐data enable us to observe the allocation of lawyers to M&A mandates under different incentive regimes. We find that law firms actively equalize the workload among their lawyers to seek efficiency gains, while “stretching” lawyers with high firm‐specific capital to a great… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the similar stretch‐role opportunity provided by pro bono activities in these different settings, and similar opportunities for more senior managers to observe performance in these stretch roles, pro bono likely serves the same mechanisms that we put forth in these settings. Opportunities remain for future research on pro bono practices in other human‐capital‐intensive or knowledge‐based industries (Anand et al, ; Chatain & Meyer‐Doyle, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the similar stretch‐role opportunity provided by pro bono activities in these different settings, and similar opportunities for more senior managers to observe performance in these stretch roles, pro bono likely serves the same mechanisms that we put forth in these settings. Opportunities remain for future research on pro bono practices in other human‐capital‐intensive or knowledge‐based industries (Anand et al, ; Chatain & Meyer‐Doyle, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we extend the existing theory on CSR as a strategic human capital management tool (Brammer, Millington, & Rayton, ; Burbano, ; Turban & Greening, ) by outlining new mechanisms through which CSR activities can be used as human capital management strategies. We also contribute more broadly to the literature on human‐resource‐based competitive advantage (Coff, ; Coff & Kryscynski, ) and on strategies relevant for human‐capital‐intensive and knowledge‐based firms (Anand, Gardner, & Morris, ; Chatain & Meyer‐Doyle, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the costs can reflect the existence of binding capacity constraints in undertaking additional legal workload. However, due to the relative elasticity of supply of partner work (Chatain & Meyer‐Doyle, 2017), such constraints are not prevalent in the sample. Overall, on the supply side, we believe that the simplest explanation is the existence of costs of expanding due to learning about the client, even though other types of costs cannot be ruled out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, interviews with actors in the market never revealed capacity constraints as a reason for not serving a client. Instead, there is evidence that partners of law firms can go to great length to ensure that they can serve all the needs of their clients, either by stretching themselves thin or by redistributing work within their firm (Chatain & Meyer‐Doyle, Forthcoming).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a strategic human capital point of view, participating in corporate social initiatives might thus provide intangible rewards for employees, such as personal meaning (Glavas & Kelley, 2014). These types of initiatives are therefore increasingly seen as an important lever for talent management, especially in human capital-intensive settings like professional service firms-where reliance exclusively on financial rewards has its limits (Anand, Gardner, & Morris, 2007;Chatain & Meyer-Doyle, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%