2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03581-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AllesTM: predicting multiple structural features of transmembrane proteins

Abstract: Background This study is motivated by the following three considerations: a) the physico-chemical properties of transmembrane (TM) proteins are distinctly different from those of globular proteins, necessitating the development of specialized structure prediction techniques, b) for many structural features no specialized predictors for TM proteins are available at all, and c) deep learning algorithms allow to automate the feature engineering process and thus facilitate the development of multi-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, the addition of hydrophobicity scales to the prediction of secondary structures gave better results [79,80]. An impressive number of methods were proposed, such as MEMSAT [81,82], HTP [83], DAS [83], SOSUI [84], HMMTOP [85,86], TMHMM 1.0 [87], PRED-TMR [88], OCTOPUS [89], TOPCONS [90,91], MINNOU [92], SVMtm [93], TUPS [94], Localizome [95], MemBrain [96], AllesTM [97], TMPSS [98], and TMbed [99]. The most recent approaches also take into account other features, such as the regions of the protein that actually face the membrane, the cytosolic or extracellular sides, and the motifs responsible for the interactions [97,[100][101][102].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the addition of hydrophobicity scales to the prediction of secondary structures gave better results [79,80]. An impressive number of methods were proposed, such as MEMSAT [81,82], HTP [83], DAS [83], SOSUI [84], HMMTOP [85,86], TMHMM 1.0 [87], PRED-TMR [88], OCTOPUS [89], TOPCONS [90,91], MINNOU [92], SVMtm [93], TUPS [94], Localizome [95], MemBrain [96], AllesTM [97], TMPSS [98], and TMbed [99]. The most recent approaches also take into account other features, such as the regions of the protein that actually face the membrane, the cytosolic or extracellular sides, and the motifs responsible for the interactions [97,[100][101][102].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than focusing on single property prediction, a few studies have sought to predict a number of properties in combination, such as solvent accessibility, secondary structures, and torsion angles. These methods include AllesTM [242] , MASSP [243] , and TopProperty [244] , which all use deep learning methods to keep abreast of any possible advances in prediction performance ( Table 6 ). For example, in the AllesTM work, the ensemble of conventional machine learning methods (random forest) and deep learning methods (CNNs and bidirectional LSTM NNs) leads to superior performance in predicting Z-coordinates, flexibility, and topology, and its performance in predicting torsion angles, secondary structures, and monomer relative solvent accessibility is roughly similar to that of SPOT-1D.…”
Section: Prediction Of Multiple Properties With Metamethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%