Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband

Amerongen, Cynthia C. A. van; Dahlin, Jakob; Isaksson, Marléne; Schuttelaar, Marie L A

doi:10.1111/cod.13378

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The length of the traditional wristband is mainly the perimeter of the wrist and the little finger, which can effectively reduce the rate of wristband falling off to a certain extent [ 19 ]. However, in clinical use, it is found that regular wearing length will cause local strangulation marks, redness, and swelling in some children, while in severe cases, there will be events such as poor local blood circulation, which will reduce the compliance of children [ 20 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study on the Suitability and Treatment Compliance of an Improved Wristband Wearing Method Compared with the Traditional Method

Wang

Zhao

Huang

et al. 2022

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Wristband identification (wristband for short) is an accurate and reliable tool for patients, and it is the basic requirement of the whole medical activity of the hospital. Wearing wristband correctly can help clinical medical staff to identify patients quickly and accurately and effectively prevent medical errors and medical accidents. According to the survey, the wristband wearing rate of clinical patients is still low, mainly because the wristband is tight and improper and the medical staff education is not in place. Therefore, how to scientifically and effectively improve the wearing rate and accuracy of patients’ wristbands is an urgent nursing safety problem to be solved. Accurate identification of children is the key to ensure the safety of clinical drug use and carry out diagnosis and treatment, and wearing wristbands is the main way to identify children. Objective. A case-control study was conducted to explore the suitability and treatment compliance of an enhanced wristband wearing method compared with the traditional method. Methods. 260 hospitalized children admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to June 2021 were randomly divided into control group and study group. The control group used a traditional wristband, while the study group used a modified wristband. The existence of wristbands, the recognition speed of medical staff, the clarity of wristband handwriting, and the incidence of skin depression were observed in the two groups. The local skin reaction, wearing rate, incidence of wristband-related adverse events, identity compliance, and family satisfaction of patients with wristband were compared. Results. In terms of authentication compliance, the normal authentication frequency of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05 ). The score of local skin reaction in the test group was lower than that in the control group, and the skin condition in the test group was better than that in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The incidence of adverse events in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The proportion of wristband position, immediate recognition, and clear handwriting in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group in terms of wristband position, recognition speed, clear handwriting, and sunken skin ( P < 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in the incidence of skin depression ( P > 0.05 ). Parents’ ratings of satisfaction with treatment and child wearing rates were compared. After the intervention, the parents’ satisfaction with diagnosis and treatment in the observation group was 89.23%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (79.23%) ( P < 0.05 ). The score of wearing rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. On the basis of ensuring children’s compliance, the improved wristband wearing method can reduce the incidence of wristband shedding and ligature marks, reduce the diagnosis and treatment error rate, enhance the suitability of wearing, enhance the work efficiency of doctors and treaters, and improve the satisfaction of diagnosis and treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study on the Suitability and Treatment Compliance of an Improved Wristband Wearing Method Compared with the Traditional Method

Wang

Zhao

Huang

et al. 2022

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…9 In the second one, the patient was not sensitised to IBOA but to another acrylate, 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate. 10 This acrylate was not found in the hospital wristband analysed in the present case. Isobornyl acrylate (IBOA), a photopolymerizable monomer commonly employed in coatings, sealants, glues, and adhesives, has garnered attention for its role in causing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to glucose monitors and insulin pumps.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 43%

Allergic contact dermatitis to isobornyl acrylate in a hospital wristband

Samaran,

Raison‐Peyron,

Dereure

et al. 2024

Contact Dermatitis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recently, HDDA was reported to cause ACD in a patient wearing a hospital wristband 19 and in a diabetes patient wearing a glucose sensor 20 . In the latter case HDDA was found in the transmitter which was attached to the sensor.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Allergic contact dermatitis due to 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in ostomy patients

Siemund,

Dahlin,

Mowitz

et al. 2024

Contact Dermatitis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundMany people live with ostomies after life‐saving surgery. Ostomy patients often suffer from peristomal dermatitis. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) has been reported, mostly due to contact allergy (CA) to topical agents.ObjectivesWe present three patients with therapy resistant peristomal dermatitis, suggesting ACD caused by different stoma products.MethodsPatch testing was performed with baseline series, additional series, and selected allergens. They were also tested with their own ostomy products as is and separate extracts of the products. Extracts were analysed using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS).ResultsIn all three patients we diagnosed CA to 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA), +++ in case (C) 1 and 3, ++ in C 2. HDDA was detected in C 2's ostomy pouch adhesive and in C 1's and 3's flange extenders used to improve the adhesion of the ostomy pouches.ConclusionTherapy resistant peristomal dermatitis should always be suspected of ACD and patch testing, especially with the patient's own products, should be performed.

show abstract

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband

Cited by 7 publications

References 8 publications

A Comparative Study on the Suitability and Treatment Compliance of an Improved Wristband Wearing Method Compared with the Traditional Method

A Comparative Study on the Suitability and Treatment Compliance of an Improved Wristband Wearing Method Compared with the Traditional Method

Allergic contact dermatitis to isobornyl acrylate in a hospital wristband

Allergic contact dermatitis due to 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in ostomy patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About