1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5699(98)80012-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allergic and autoimmune reactions to xenobiotics: how do they arise?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Release of DNA from the apoptotic cells has been proposed as the source of antigenic DNA for anti-DNA antibody synthesis in this model (30,31,52). Others have proposed that apoptotic cells provide autoantigens as well (73,74 (76). Urushiol, the irritant in poison ivy, is a linically relevant example of this (76).…”
Section: Signaling Modifiersmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Release of DNA from the apoptotic cells has been proposed as the source of antigenic DNA for anti-DNA antibody synthesis in this model (30,31,52). Others have proposed that apoptotic cells provide autoantigens as well (73,74 (76). Urushiol, the irritant in poison ivy, is a linically relevant example of this (76).…”
Section: Signaling Modifiersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Others have proposed that apoptotic cells provide autoantigens as well (73,74 (76). Urushiol, the irritant in poison ivy, is a linically relevant example of this (76). Once a response is initiated, the phenomenon of epitope spreading may occur, in which antigenic epitopes associated with but physically distinct from the hapten are progressively recognized by responding T and B cells (77).…”
Section: Signaling Modifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the most widely accepted view is that covalent modi®cation leads to perturbation of the host's own immune system. Following antigen recognition, the drug-modi®ed protein is processed and presented in association with MHC class I and/or II molecules to T-cells (signal 1) (Coleman & Blanca, 1998;Griem et al, 1998). Signal 1 governs the nature of the immune response (i.e., CD4 + or CD8 + ) (Kalish & Askenase, 1999), while co-stimulatory signals (signal 2) and/or cytokine synthesis (signal 3) determine whether antigen presentation results in tissue damage or tolerance (Curtsinger et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%