2017
DOI: 10.22438/jeb/38/6(si)/07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allelopathic effects among selected species of phytoplankton and macrophytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences regarding the presence, or not, of a subsurface sector and its size might be causing the greatest differences between the inner sites in TM and those in the other two CWs. Moreover, the presence of reeds (P. australis) along this sector in TM, and their allelopathic effect on Microcystis aeruginosa (Kützing) Kützing 1846 (Chicalote-Castillo et al, 2017) might be related to the sharp decrease observed in this species after water flowed through the CW (up to 20 times lower biovolume in the Outlet than in the Inlet). Related to this, macrophytes in CWs also have a strong influence on the structure and dynamics of the plankton community, since their coverage is a major factor strongly modifying light conditions (Travaini-Lima et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences regarding the presence, or not, of a subsurface sector and its size might be causing the greatest differences between the inner sites in TM and those in the other two CWs. Moreover, the presence of reeds (P. australis) along this sector in TM, and their allelopathic effect on Microcystis aeruginosa (Kützing) Kützing 1846 (Chicalote-Castillo et al, 2017) might be related to the sharp decrease observed in this species after water flowed through the CW (up to 20 times lower biovolume in the Outlet than in the Inlet). Related to this, macrophytes in CWs also have a strong influence on the structure and dynamics of the plankton community, since their coverage is a major factor strongly modifying light conditions (Travaini-Lima et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…contained phenol and gallic acid as a prominent compound. Gallic acid and the organic acid ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) methyl acetoacetate were isolated from root exudates, whereas taraxerol and taraxeron from the leaves [193]. High cellulose and lignin were also reported in the aqueous solution of Phragmites australis [194].…”
Section: Emergent Aquatic Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consiste en el estudio de una sola especie de cianobacteria. Permite conocer los posibles mecanismos de acción que ejerce alguna sustancia en el organismo de las cianobacterias (Meng et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015;Li et al, 2016;Chicalote et al, 2017;Yakefu et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Pruebas Alguicidasunclassified