1998
DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00109-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allelic variation at the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene is associated with early postmenopausal bone loss at the spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…BMD is the major factor determining bone strength and, consequently, osteoporotic fracture risk, and can be considered a quantitative polygenic trait. It has been shown that several genes are associated with BMD, although conflicting results also exist (Kanis et al, 1994;Morrison et al, 1994;Kobayashi et al, 1996;Murray et al, 1997;Keen et al, 1998;Eisman, 1999;Yamada et al, 2001;Arko et al, 2002;Garcia-Giralt et al, 2002). IL10 is a powerful T H 2-cell cytokine, and the MCP gene family is a beta-chemokine that binds primarily to C-C chemokine receptors, such as CCR2 or CCR3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BMD is the major factor determining bone strength and, consequently, osteoporotic fracture risk, and can be considered a quantitative polygenic trait. It has been shown that several genes are associated with BMD, although conflicting results also exist (Kanis et al, 1994;Morrison et al, 1994;Kobayashi et al, 1996;Murray et al, 1997;Keen et al, 1998;Eisman, 1999;Yamada et al, 2001;Arko et al, 2002;Garcia-Giralt et al, 2002). IL10 is a powerful T H 2-cell cytokine, and the MCP gene family is a beta-chemokine that binds primarily to C-C chemokine receptors, such as CCR2 or CCR3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was supported by twin studies showing a much higher concordance of bone mineral density (BMD) in monozygotic than dizygotic twins (Slemenda et al, 1991;Kanis et al, 1994;Young et al, 1995;Arden and Spector 1997;Eisman 1999;Stewart and Ralston 2000). Numerous candidate genes and their genetic variants, including estrogen receptor (ER), transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFB1), Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL1RA), Interleukin6 (IL6), collagen 1A1 (COL1A1) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), (Kobayashi et al, 1996;Murray et al, 1997;Keen et al, 1998;Yamada et al, 2001;Arko et al, 2002; Garcia-*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 82-2-3675-2186; Fax: 82-2-3675-2189 E-mail: hdshin@snp-genetics.com Giralt et al, 2002), have been proposed and implicated as genetic markers for BMD, since Morrison and his colleagues reported that vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism was involved in bone metabolism (Morrison et al, 1992;Morrison et al, 1994) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A VNTR of 86 bp repeats within intron 2 of the gene was tested for association with bone variables in several studies. Significant association of the VNTR polymorphism with rates of change in spinal bone mass, spine bone loss (Keen et al 1998), and lumbar and hip BMD (Langdahl et al 2000c, Fontova et al 2002 was identified.…”
Section: Other Genetic Polymorphismsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Population-based association studies have suggested that genetic effects can be ascribed to polymorphisms of a number of genes involved in bone metabolism, although the genetic basis of osteoporosis is not well understood. Polymorphisms of genes encoding vitamin D receptor (VDR), estrogen receptor (ER), collagen type I alpha (COL1A1), calcitonin receptor (CTR), osteocalcin, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RN), insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), calcitonin receptor (CTR), parathyroid hormone (PTH), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma), calcitonin (CT), and interleukin-6 (IL6) have all been implicated as genetic markers for BMD (Morrison et al 1994;Sano et al 1995;Grant et al 1996;Dohi et al 1998;Keen et al 1998;Masi et al 1998;Miyao et al 1998;Taboulet et al 1998;Yamada et al 1998;Hosoi et al 1999;Ogawa et al 1999;Tsukamoto et al 1999;Miyao et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%