2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-008-0686-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allelic genotyping reveals a hierarchy of genomic alterations in mantle cell lymphoma associated to cell proliferation

Abstract: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct subentity of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, characterized by the chromosomal translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) leading to an overexpression of cyclin D1 in virtually all cases. However, additional cytogenetic aberrations are apparent in the vast majority of MCL. Applying LOH analysis in 52 MCL patient samples, we confirmed frequent alterations in 9p21 (28.6%) and p53 (28.9%) but also detected allelic losses in 1p21, 9q21, 13q13-14, 13q31-32, 17p13.1, and 17p13.3 in 28-45% of cases… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the second cluster had an interesting pattern represented by the presence of 11q loss in all cases and at the same time complete absence of 13q loss, larger 8q gains, 3q gains, and 7p gains. This implies that some aberrations tend to occur together in MCL as a few studies have previously suggested (Sander et al, 2008;Hutter et al, 2009). However, the relatively small dataset available for this study was a limiting factor in the analysis, and therefore larger studies are required to clarify further the co-occurrence of various CNAs in MCL subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, the second cluster had an interesting pattern represented by the presence of 11q loss in all cases and at the same time complete absence of 13q loss, larger 8q gains, 3q gains, and 7p gains. This implies that some aberrations tend to occur together in MCL as a few studies have previously suggested (Sander et al, 2008;Hutter et al, 2009). However, the relatively small dataset available for this study was a limiting factor in the analysis, and therefore larger studies are required to clarify further the co-occurrence of various CNAs in MCL subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%