1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008320609591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allelic expression of p73 in human ovarian cancers

Abstract: In comparisons of ovarian cancers and borderline tumors, no differences in allelic distribution and/or expression were found, suggesting that p73 does not play an important role in the pathogenesis and development of ovarian cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that the p73 gene may be not the target of 1p36.3 LOH in parathyroid adenomas, although allelic loss of the p73 is present. A similar conclusion ruling out p73 as a target gene was reached in studies of ovarian adenocarcinoma that harbor frequent LOH at 1p36 (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Our results indicate that the p73 gene may be not the target of 1p36.3 LOH in parathyroid adenomas, although allelic loss of the p73 is present. A similar conclusion ruling out p73 as a target gene was reached in studies of ovarian adenocarcinoma that harbor frequent LOH at 1p36 (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Point mutations or very small deletions cannot be excluded with certainty in our patient samples; however, somatic mutations of the p73 gene in ovarian carcinomas (Ng et al, 2000) and other types of neoplasm appear to be very rare (Ikawa et al, 1999; Mai et al, 1998; Shishikura et al, 1999; Takahashi et al, 1998; reviewed by Levrero et al, 2000). In addition, a study on a large series of ovarian cancers reported only 2 cases with loss of heterozygosity at the p73 gene locus and no differences in allelic expression (Codegoni et al, 1999). These negative data and reports on consistent over‐expression of p73 at the RNA and the protein levels (Mai et al, 1998; Takahashi et al, 1998), as well as in our work, rather point to an oncogenic role of p73 in cancer, which would certainly warrant further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 20 human genes have been reported to have a mononucleotide repeat (of at least 8 bp) in a coding region, and many of these have been observed to suffer mutation. The list of genes carrying a coding-mononucleotide repeat includes genes that perform functions critical for preventing cancer, such as DNA repair (RAD50, DNA-PKcs, hMSH3, hMSH6, and XPG) and regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumor growth (TGF␤RII, IGFIIR, CHK-1, BAX, ICE, caspase-5, FLASH, Apaf-1, E2F-4, TCF-4, Apc, c-myb, MYCL, CtIP, and MLSN1) (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Many more human genes are at risk of suffering mutation due to mononucleotide repeat instability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells proficient in repair do not exhibit MSI-H, but evidence is accumulating suggesting that low-level instability can occur (24). A so-called lowmicrosatellite-instability phenotype has been reported in cells from tissues that are either inflamed or hyperplastic and in carcinogen-induced rat mammary tumors (10,14,25,26). In addition, changes were seen in somatic cell microsatellites of offspring of individuals exposed to radiation from the Chernobyl disaster (27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%