1998
DOI: 10.1097/00042560-199802010-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allele Frequency of the CCR5 Mutant Chemokine Receptor in Greek Caucasians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the group of HIV‐positive individuals no mutant homozygous genotypes were found. These results are consistent with the CCR5 allele frequencies previously found in a separate group of Greek Caucasians [6]. The frequency of the CCR5Δ 32 allele among HIV‐negative subjects in Greece (0.052) is in the mid range of the values observed in Northern Europe (∼0.09) and those observed in Cyprus (0.029) [7].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the group of HIV‐positive individuals no mutant homozygous genotypes were found. These results are consistent with the CCR5 allele frequencies previously found in a separate group of Greek Caucasians [6]. The frequency of the CCR5Δ 32 allele among HIV‐negative subjects in Greece (0.052) is in the mid range of the values observed in Northern Europe (∼0.09) and those observed in Cyprus (0.029) [7].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the group of HIV-positive individuals no mutant homozygous genotypes were found. These results are consistent with the CCR5 allele frequencies previously found in a separate group of Greek Caucasians [6]. The frequency of the CCR5v32 allele among HIV-negative subjects in Greece (0.052) is in the mid range of the values observed in Northern Europe (V0.09) and those observed in Cyprus (0.029) [7].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although individuals with homozygous ¢ccr-5 genotypes have been determined to be strongly protected from sexual infection [33], the homozygous genotype does not offer complete protection [37]. In heterozygous adults, the protective effect concerning HIV-1 infection is seen by as much as a twofold lower infection rate for heterozygous CCR5/¢ccr5 adults than wildtype CCR5/CCR5 [32,35,38,39]. Similarly, some data have determined that heterozygous infants have some protection from vertical transmission infection, although not as much as adult protection from sexual infection [35,40], while others suggest there is no correlation between heterozygous genotype and protection from infection by vertical transmission [34,36,41,42].…”
Section: Timing Of Vertical Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%