Allele frequency divergence reveals ubiquitous influence of positive selection in Drosophila

Abstract

Resolving the role of natural selection is a basic objective of evolutionary biology. It is generally difficult to detect the influence of selection because ubiquitous non-selective stochastic change in allele frequencies (genetic drift) degrades evidence of selection. As a result, selection scans typically only identify genomic regions that have undergone episodes of intense selection. Yet it seems likely such episodes are the exception; the norm is more likely to involve subtle, concurrent selective changes at a large number of loci. We develop a new theoretical approach that uncovers a previously undocumented genome-wide signature of selection in the collective divergence of allele frequencies over time. Applying our approach to temporally resolved allele frequency measurements from laboratory and wild Drosophila populations, we quantify the selective contribution to allele frequency divergence and find that selection has substantial effects on much of the genome. We further quantify the magnitude of the total selection coefficient (a measure of the combined effects of direct and linked selection) at a typical polymorphic locus, and find this to be large (of order 1%) even though most mutations are not directly under selection. We find that selective allele frequency divergence is substantially elevated at intermediate allele frequencies, which we argue is most parsimoniously explained by positive—not negative—selection. Thus, in these populations most mutations are far from evolving neutrally in the short term (tens of generations), including mutations with neutral fitness effects, and the result cannot be explained simply as an ongoing purging of deleterious mutations.

Substitution load revisited: a high proportion of deaths can be selective

“…However, the basis for this historical argument is now on troubled ground, because recent literature argues that the fraction of substitutions explained by adaptation can be high (Galtier 2016; Murga-Moreno et al 2023; Sella et al 2009; Uricchio, Petrov, and Enard 2019), and that on shorter timescales, as much as 37% of allele frequency change is attributable to adaptation (Buffalo and Coop 2020). For example, recent experiments have shown rapid, pervasive seasonal adaptation in Drosophila (Bertram 2021; Kelly 2022; Machado et al 2021). There are other possible resolutions — e.g.…”

Polymorphism of the myostatin gene exon 1 using PCR-RFLP technique in five beef cattle in Indonesia

“…If an adequate sample size were available, the CC genotype should be present in Madura and PO cattle. This anomaly could have been caused by several reasons, such as a limited sample size that might not adequately represent the population, genetic drift, or the possibility of eliminating cattle with the CC genotype [21].…”

The contribution of gene flow, selection, and genetic drift to five thousand years of human allele frequency change

“…This approach has been applied to experimental evolution datasets (Brennan et al, 2022; Buffalo & Coop, 2020) and to natural populations where temporal sampling is available (in Mimulus , oaks and cod; Kelly, 2022; Reid et al, 2023; Saleh et al, 2022). These applications, along with related methods (Bertram, 2021), have revealed that a reasonable proportion of total allele frequency change, especially in artificial selection experiments, can be attributed to widespread selection beyond just a few outliers. However, applying these methods when population structure and migration are present will give biased results, as sustained gene flow across time periods can also drive temporal covariance in allele frequency change.…”