2013
DOI: 10.1080/1936928x.2013.837420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alleged Sex Abuse Victims’ Accounts of Their Abusers’ Modus Operandi

Abstract: One hundred four alleged sexual victims aged between 3 and 13 years described the modus operandi of their reported assailants. Younger children were more likely than older children to report repeated incidents of abuse by family members. Abuse tended to be more severe when there were multiple incidents. Older victims were more likely to report resisting the offenders’ strategies, which involved either persuasion (i.e., offering rewards, verbally convincing or provoking the victim) or coercion (i.e., verbal or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Less protracted offending more typically entailed preliminary grooming behaviors, and no contact or non-penetrative sexual contact (Case 3011). These findings replicated previous research showing that persistent offending was more severe than single abuse events (van Gijn & Lamb, 2013). Furthermore, our in-depth analyses in the present study of the modi operandi of offenders disclosed how they adapted to contextual factors and changed strategies to continue their abuse (Bartol & Bartol, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Less protracted offending more typically entailed preliminary grooming behaviors, and no contact or non-penetrative sexual contact (Case 3011). These findings replicated previous research showing that persistent offending was more severe than single abuse events (van Gijn & Lamb, 2013). Furthermore, our in-depth analyses in the present study of the modi operandi of offenders disclosed how they adapted to contextual factors and changed strategies to continue their abuse (Bartol & Bartol, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As was demonstrated in case 1208, the offender devised another way to gain access to children when his first means of access was closed. Moreover, although previous research showed that offenders applied either persuasive or coercive techniques (van Gijn & Lamb, 2013), our comparative analyses of modi operandi in this study sample disclosed that offenders did not utilize a single strategy, but were versatile, and modified their tactics in the course of the abusive relationship to secure ongoing compliance of their victims. For example the offender in case 1202 started with socially persuasive techniques and switched to more coercive strategies when the complainant became resistant, or the offender perceived that the victim might resist.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…When the perpetrator is a family member, we can expect to see less use of violence for they do not want to cause pain and bleeding, so they can repeat the act in the future (Lang & Frenzel, 1988). A forensic interview study that focused on the perpetrator behaviors of persuasion and coercion as reported by children found that abuse was more likely to involve persuasion than coercion, and found no significant association between perpetrator age and the use of coercion; older perpetrators were more likely to use persuasion, however (Van Gijn & Lamb, 2013).…”
Section: Children-perpetrator Dynamic In Csamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…van Gijn and Lamb’s (2013) study also relied on children as a source of information for the manipulation process. They analyzed 104 forensic investigations with children who were alleged to be victims of CSA.…”
Section: Offender Behaviors: the Children’s Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%