Leibniz and His Correspondents 2004
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511498237.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“All the time and everywhere everything's the same as here”: The Principle of Uniformity in the Correspondence Between Leibniz and Lady Masham

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Crucially, for Biran, the argument is used to allow ontological space for the willing subject. However, second, as Pauline Phemister (2004) has shown, Leibniz uses it in relation to English empiricist philosophers such as Locke. This use is vital because BiranÕs work was an attempt to reform empiricism (see Hallie 1959).…”
Section: It Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crucially, for Biran, the argument is used to allow ontological space for the willing subject. However, second, as Pauline Phemister (2004) has shown, Leibniz uses it in relation to English empiricist philosophers such as Locke. This use is vital because BiranÕs work was an attempt to reform empiricism (see Hallie 1959).…”
Section: It Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anticipating the iconic argument at the opening of the Monadology, he declared in the New System that, a simple mass of matter, however organized it may be … can only be considered as an army or a herd, or a pond full of fish, or like a watch composed of springs and 31 Leibniz does argue elsewhere that we can extrapolate from our own experience to the probability that other creatures have experiences also. See Phemister (2004).…”
Section: Souls Preformation and Causationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, se le recuerda al amable lector que este ensayo se centra en el análisis de los argumentos de Masham y no en los de Leibniz. Para el análisis de la metafísica de Leibniz en este intercambio epistolar se sugierePheminster (2004).…”
unclassified