2017
DOI: 10.1080/08824096.2017.1282856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All the Polling (Data) That’s Fit to Print? An Analysis of Online News Coverage of 2016 Primary Polls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more recent study of the US context on the 2016 primaries (Turcotte, Medenilla, Villaseñor, & Lampwalla, 2017) found that broadcast news outlets were more transparent in their poll reporting (i.e., in providing more methodological details) compared to print and online news. Transparency decreased as election day neared, however.…”
Section: The Quality Of Poll Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent study of the US context on the 2016 primaries (Turcotte, Medenilla, Villaseñor, & Lampwalla, 2017) found that broadcast news outlets were more transparent in their poll reporting (i.e., in providing more methodological details) compared to print and online news. Transparency decreased as election day neared, however.…”
Section: The Quality Of Poll Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersion results from high rates of reporting on abortion research; bias results from the constant repetition of negative stereotypes. Polling data (and the survey items they rely on) appear objective to the viewing public and, for this reason, are frequently included in news coverage (Boudreau & McCubbins, 2010;Turcotte, Medenilla, Villaseñor, & Lampwalla, 2017). Craig (2014) argued that polls are associated with greater objectivity because they do not "emanate from either party" (p. x) and are imagined to be unaffected by political ideology.…”
Section: Dispersion Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%