1997
DOI: 10.1109/2944.658592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-optical wavelength conversion at bit rates above 10 Gb/s using semiconductor optical amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Inverting operation is still preferable above non-inverting, due to its larger regenerative effect. The conversion speed of the present device for the counter-propagation mode is measured to be far slower compared to the co-propagating operation, what is generally the case for SOA-MZI wavelength converters [15]. Therefore, the measurement at 10 Gbit/s is only performed in co-propagating operation mode.…”
Section: Dynamic Range and Pattern Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inverting operation is still preferable above non-inverting, due to its larger regenerative effect. The conversion speed of the present device for the counter-propagation mode is measured to be far slower compared to the co-propagating operation, what is generally the case for SOA-MZI wavelength converters [15]. Therefore, the measurement at 10 Gbit/s is only performed in co-propagating operation mode.…”
Section: Dynamic Range and Pattern Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The counter-propagating operation is not very attractive due to the counter-directional coupling that causes pattern-dependent timing jitter, which limits the cascadeability. Moreover, the conversion speed is limited by a modulation bandwidth, which is inherently lower than for co-directional coupling [13][14][15]. The fastest achieved conversion for counter-propagating operation mode was measured for a non-inverting current setting at 2.5 Gbit/s.…”
Section: Dynamic Range and Pattern Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the major limitation of SOAbased wavelength converters is the slow SOA recovery, causing unwanted pattern effects in the converted signal and limiting the maximum operation speed of the wavelength converters. It has already been theoretically and experimentally clarified that the increase in electrical pumping power, confinement factor and the device interaction length effectively improve the speed performance (Joergensen et al, 1997). For improving the SOA-based wavelength converters, some techniques are proposed, such as: Fiber Bragg grating at 100 Gbit/s (Ellis et al, 1998), interferometric configuration at 168 Gbit/s (Nakamura et al, 2001), two cascaded SOAs at 170.4 Gbit/s (Manning et al, 2006) and optical filtering at 320 Gbit/s (Liu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Application Of Soa Nonlinearities To Achieve Wavelength Convmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the major limitation of SOA-based wavelength converters is the slow SOA recovery, causing unwanted pattern effects in the converted signal, and limiting the maximum operation speed of the wavelength converters. It has already been theoretically and experimentally clarified that the increase in electrical pumping power, confinement factor, and interaction device length effectively improve the speed performance [9][10]. For improving the SOA-based wavelength converters, some techniques are proposed, such as: Fiber Bragg grating at 100 Gbit/s [3], interferometric configuration at 168 Gbit/s [11], two cascaded SOAs at 170.4 Gbit/s [12], and optical filtering at 320 Gbit/s [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%