2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-018-0142-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-optical synaptic electrophysiology probes mechanism of ketamine-induced disinhibition

Abstract: Optical assays of synaptic strength would greatly facilitate studies of neuronal transmission and its dysregulation in disease. Here we introduce a genetic toolbox for all-optical interrogation of synaptic electrophysiology (‘synOptopatch’) via mutually exclusive expression of a channelrhodopsin actuator and an archaerhodopsin-derived voltage indicator. Optically induced activity in the channelrhodopsin-expressing neurons generated excitatory and inhibitory post-synaptic potentials which were optically resolve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in principle the disinhibition hypothesis is general and need not be tied to particular GABAergic neuron subtypes, so far empirical studies of NMDAR hypofunction have focused on fast-spiking cells for technical reasons. For example, recordings of inhibitory postsynaptic currents have provided clear evidence for disinhibition 32,33 , but the method cannot distinguish the cell types that provide the GABAergic inputs, and an electrode placed at the soma tends to favor the detection of perisomatic inputs. In vivo electrophysiology has also supported disinhibition by showing reduced activity for fast-spiking cells 11 , but SST interneurons are likely not examined in this earlier study because their spike waveforms have overlapping features with excitatory neurons and thus cannot be easily isolated 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in principle the disinhibition hypothesis is general and need not be tied to particular GABAergic neuron subtypes, so far empirical studies of NMDAR hypofunction have focused on fast-spiking cells for technical reasons. For example, recordings of inhibitory postsynaptic currents have provided clear evidence for disinhibition 32,33 , but the method cannot distinguish the cell types that provide the GABAergic inputs, and an electrode placed at the soma tends to favor the detection of perisomatic inputs. In vivo electrophysiology has also supported disinhibition by showing reduced activity for fast-spiking cells 11 , but SST interneurons are likely not examined in this earlier study because their spike waveforms have overlapping features with excitatory neurons and thus cannot be easily isolated 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established that synaptic interactions between GABAergic interneurons and pyramidal neurons determine the excitation/inhibition balance in neural circuit functioning and contribute to the generation of gamma oscillations ( Cardin et al, 2009 ; Sohal et al, 2009 ). There is also evidence that NMDARs contribute more to the excitatory postsynaptic currents in GABAergic interneurons than in pyramidal neurons ( Jones et al, 1993 ), and ketamine/MK-801 preferentially blocks NMDARs in GABAergic interneurons ( Homayoun et al, 2007 ; Suryavanshi et al, 2014 ; Fan et al, 2018 ). Thus, it is important to further examine the hypothesis that GABAergic interneurons are particularly affected by NMDAr hypofunction in SZ ( Cohen et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in principle the disinhibition hypothesis is general and need not be tied to particular GABAergic neuron subtypes, so far empirical studies of NMDAR hypofunction have focused on fast-spiking cells for technical reasons. For example, recordings of inhibitory postsynaptic currents have provided clear evidence for disinhibition 30,31 , but the method cannot distinguish the cell types that provide the GABAergic inputs, and somatic electrodes tend to favor the detection of perisomatic inputs. In vivo electrophysiology has also supported disinhibition by showing reduced activity for fast-spiking cells 12 , but again SST interneurons are likely not examined in this earlier study because their spike waveforms have overlapping features with excitatory neurons and thus cannot be easily isolated 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%