2021
DOI: 10.1002/smsc.202000079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All‐Optical Modulation with Dielectric Nanoantennas: Multiresonant Control and Ultrafast Spatial Inhomogeneities

Abstract: The transient optical response of multiresonant all-dielectric nanoantennas via a combination of broadband ultrafast reflectivity experiments and nonlinear optics nanoscale modeling is studied. Ultrafast all-optical control of the reflectivity is demonstrated in variably sized Al .18 Ga .82 As nanoantennas over four distinct Mie resonances (including Fano-like resonances), spanning a broad spectral range, from the red to the near-infrared. A spatially inhomogeneous dynamical model, which accounts for diffusion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon a change of the NP constituent medium permittivity Δε , the optical transmittance evolves from T (ε) to T (ε + Δε ) . When Δε ≪ ε, a perturbative approach can be applied to determine ΔT = T (ε + Δε ) – T (ε) = ∂ T /∂ε × Δε (see, e.g., refs ). Yet, generally the evolution from T (ε) to T (ε + Δε ) is not perturbative, and ΔT does not scale linearly with Δε , as depicted in Figure a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon a change of the NP constituent medium permittivity Δε , the optical transmittance evolves from T (ε) to T (ε + Δε ) . When Δε ≪ ε, a perturbative approach can be applied to determine ΔT = T (ε + Δε ) – T (ε) = ∂ T /∂ε × Δε (see, e.g., refs ). Yet, generally the evolution from T (ε) to T (ε + Δε ) is not perturbative, and ΔT does not scale linearly with Δε , as depicted in Figure a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the AlGaAs, the carrier density is evaluated by Keldysh photoionization rate normal∂Nenormal∂t=wPIfalse(Efalse→,normalλ,Eg,mefalse)Ne/normalτrec for the electric field Efalse→ and laser wavelength λ, whereas constant E g = 1.67 eV, me=0.07.1emme, τ rec = 11 ps, and ν e ~10 13 s −1 are adopted from ( 35 ) in the ionization model. In the absence of carriers, the third-order Kerr-like response is given by polarization P(3)=normalε0normalχfalse(3false)false(Efalse→Efalse→false)Efalse→ with χ (3) = 3.4 · 10 −19 m 2 /V 2 ( 36 ) and the second-order response for noncentrosymmetric material by P(2)=normalε0normalχfalse(2false)false(EyEz,ExEz,ExEyfalse) ( 37 ) with χ (2) ~300 pm/V ( 38 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the difference in amplitude, the rise time of the modulated signal in the case of an inhomogeneous approach is almost doubled (from ∼400 fs to ∼800 fs). Such delay effect in reaching the peak is indeed assigned to spatio-temporal inhomogeneities taking place at the nanoscale [55] and explained as the fingerprint of a homogenization process undergone by excitation across the individual meta-atoms, which modifies the dynamics of the optical excitation. However, the most striking difference between model predictions is observed at λ 1 = 610 nm (top curves in figure 4(d)).…”
Section: Tapered Cross Section Nanowire Metasurfacementioning
confidence: 95%