2000
DOI: 10.1109/50.908817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-optical label swapping networks and technologies

Abstract: payload with the 1.244-Gb/s label was demonstrated. The results showed small power penalty as much as 0.2 dB in payload transmission, which arises from crosstalk with the label, and the CS-SH-SCM labeling technique showed increased capability for multiple-span transmission of the payload with successive label swapping. ACKNOWLEDGMENTThis work was partially supported by the Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) through the OIRC project.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
149
0
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
149
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Labels are received and swapped at every node in a core network, while payload information is transparently forwarded with possible wavelength conversion [2]. Several label-coding techniques have been reported, such as serial-bit labeling [4], subcarrier multiplexing [1]- [3], and orthogonal modulation labeling [5]- [17]. The orthogonal modulation technique encodes the label information on the optical carrier wave in a modulation format that is orthogonal to that of the payload, e.g., the label information is differential phase-shift keying (DPSK) modulated on the phase or frequency-shift keying (FSK) modulated on the optical frequency, while the payload is modulated on the amplitude of the carrier; such methods are termed amplitude shift keying (ASK)/DPSK [7]- [10] and ASK/FSK [11], [12] labeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Labels are received and swapped at every node in a core network, while payload information is transparently forwarded with possible wavelength conversion [2]. Several label-coding techniques have been reported, such as serial-bit labeling [4], subcarrier multiplexing [1]- [3], and orthogonal modulation labeling [5]- [17]. The orthogonal modulation technique encodes the label information on the optical carrier wave in a modulation format that is orthogonal to that of the payload, e.g., the label information is differential phase-shift keying (DPSK) modulated on the phase or frequency-shift keying (FSK) modulated on the optical frequency, while the payload is modulated on the amplitude of the carrier; such methods are termed amplitude shift keying (ASK)/DPSK [7]- [10] and ASK/FSK [11], [12] labeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A LL-OPTICAL label switching is an important technique used to route and forward packets in future high-speed networks independently of IP packet length and payload bit rate [1]. Labels are received and swapped at every node in a core network, while payload information is transparently forwarded with possible wavelength conversion [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The label erasing and new label insertion operation introduces 0.5 dB of power penalty. These results indicate a potential utilisation of the presented technique in a multi-hop packet switched network.Introduction: All-optical packet switching (AOPS) is a promising candidate to route optical packets at higher bit rates and with lower power dissipation compared to electronics [1][2][3]. The key issue is to realise an AOPS node that is scalable and that allows photonic integration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors' affiliations: (1) Photonic Systems Group, Tyndall National Institute & Department of Physics, University College Cork, Lee Maltings, Cork, Ireland, Email: arvind.mishra@ucc.ie (2) School of Electronic Engineering, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods of coding labels have been proposed, for either label swapping or deterministic routing algorithms [1][2][3][4][5]. Depending on the particular implementation, the overall system performance is impacted in various ways: by reducing the overall spectral efficiency [2]; by reducing the payload extinction ratio to allow sub-carrier modulation [3]; or by introducing sophisticated transmitter [4] or receiver configurations to perform label erasure and reinsertion [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%