2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All in the family: The effect of family ownership on acquisition performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
21
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also shows that family companies though have small assets are able to produce greater profits; while non-family companies with large assets produce smaller benefits. This conclusion is in agreement with research conducted by Anderson & Reeb (2003), Bouzgarrou & Navatte (2013), Adhikari & Sutton (2016), Wang & Shailer (2017) who concluded that the performance of family firms is better than the one of non-family companies. This is because the family companies can improve monitoring to managers or can align the interests of majority and minority shareholders to improve the company's performance.…”
Section: Future Performance Of Family Owned and Non-family Firmssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study also shows that family companies though have small assets are able to produce greater profits; while non-family companies with large assets produce smaller benefits. This conclusion is in agreement with research conducted by Anderson & Reeb (2003), Bouzgarrou & Navatte (2013), Adhikari & Sutton (2016), Wang & Shailer (2017) who concluded that the performance of family firms is better than the one of non-family companies. This is because the family companies can improve monitoring to managers or can align the interests of majority and minority shareholders to improve the company's performance.…”
Section: Future Performance Of Family Owned and Non-family Firmssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It means that third hypothesis is accepted. This research supports previous study of Anderson & Reeb (2003), Bouzgarrou & Navatte (2013), Xia (2008), Adhikari & Sutton(2016), and Wang & Shailer (2017). Table 5 shows the results for testing the fourth hypothesis which states whether the type of auditor has positive effect on future performance.…”
Section: The Effect Of Earnings Management (Dac) On Future Performancesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existing studies provide limited substantial evidence on the effect of family ownership for long-run performance. There are two studies for example, Adhikari and Sutton (2016) find that acquirers controlled by families earned higher returns in acquisitions. By using matching firm and market index as benchmarks, they argue that family firms engage in acquisitions by undertaking unrelated firms to reduce the risk of investment through lowering cost of capital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…suggests that instead of focusing on the development and application of generic frameworks, new research needs to consider deeper questions as to what the challenges are facing the diverse nature of family ownership and control and calls for greater empirical research on the impact familiness has on the firm's resilience capability.Finally, the work observes that family businesses can demonstrate superior performance in comparison to their non-family peers(Anderson & Reeb, 2003;Bouzgarrou & Navatte, 2013;Adhikari & Sutton, 2016;Wang & Shailer, 2017) and as such gaining great understanding into the nature of familiness could provide greater insights in towards organisational resilience as a whole. Beer, S., (1972), Brain of the firm: a development in management cybernetics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%