2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.125210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-electron self-consistentGWin the Matsubara-time domain: Implementation and benchmarks of semiconductors and insulators

Abstract: The GW approximation is a well-known method to improve electronic structure predictions calculated within density functional theory. In this work, we have implemented a computationally efficient GW approach that calculates central properties within the Matsubara-time domain using the modified version of Elk, the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave (FP-LAPW) package. Continuous-pole expansion (CPE), a recently proposed analytic continuation method, has been incorporated and compared to the widely use… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the non-self-consistent G 0 W 0 calculations are performed, the band gaps for GaAs and CdS are 1.29 and 2.10 eV, respectively. These values are in relatively good agreement with other theoretical results [7,27,56], including the all-electron results [7,56]. For ZnO, the values of G 0 W 0 band gap are very scattered, ranging from 2.11 to 4.23 eV [27,44,56,57], due to different approximations, truncations and initial input eigen energies and wave functions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the non-self-consistent G 0 W 0 calculations are performed, the band gaps for GaAs and CdS are 1.29 and 2.10 eV, respectively. These values are in relatively good agreement with other theoretical results [7,27,56], including the all-electron results [7,56]. For ZnO, the values of G 0 W 0 band gap are very scattered, ranging from 2.11 to 4.23 eV [27,44,56,57], due to different approximations, truncations and initial input eigen energies and wave functions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These values are in relatively good agreement with other theoretical results [7,27,56], including the all-electron results [7,56]. For ZnO, the values of G 0 W 0 band gap are very scattered, ranging from 2.11 to 4.23 eV [27,44,56,57], due to different approximations, truncations and initial input eigen energies and wave functions. In one recent work [43], Shih and Louie found that the conventional G 0 W 0 method can yield a band gap that is very close to the experimental value for wurtzite ZnO, if one uses LDA+U as initial inputs, high cutoff energies and enough conduction bands (about 3000 empty states).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are numerous computational developments in this area (see for example [9,10,11] and references therein). For our present study we found particularly useful publication by Rieger et al on the space-time method [12] and work by Ku and Eguiluz on the application of Matsubara time in GW calculations [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GW calculations were performed with the self-consistent GW approach in the Matsubara implementation with the diagonal approximation. 39,40 The GW bandgap corrections were determined within an accuracy of 0.1 eV after converging the number of bands (40).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%