2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-electron Douglas–Kroll–Hess and pseudopotential study on the low-lying states of uranium hydride UH

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For a DKH calculation using an allelectron basis set, Cao, Moritz, and Dolg calculated a SO correction for the ground state (mainly 4 I) of neutral UH of 0.08 and 0.12 eV depending on the method used. 112 Balasubramanian calculated an effect of 0.09 eV for UH 2 . 113 In a subsequent paper, Dolg and Cao improved their results and found a larger SO correction for UH of 0.2 eV.…”
Section: ■ Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a DKH calculation using an allelectron basis set, Cao, Moritz, and Dolg calculated a SO correction for the ground state (mainly 4 I) of neutral UH of 0.08 and 0.12 eV depending on the method used. 112 Balasubramanian calculated an effect of 0.09 eV for UH 2 . 113 In a subsequent paper, Dolg and Cao improved their results and found a larger SO correction for UH of 0.2 eV.…”
Section: ■ Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the calculated SO correction for the UH + BDE is attributed to the difference in atomic spin–orbit corrections for U + and U 2+ . For a DKH calculation using an all-electron basis set, Cao, Moritz, and Dolg calculated a SO correction for the ground state (mainly 4 I) of neutral UH of 0.08 and 0.12 eV depending on the method used . Balasubramanian calculated an effect of 0.09 eV for UH 2 .…”
Section: Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was expected that excitations from these orbitals would be unimportant for the ground and low-lying states of UF and UF + , at least near the equilibrium bond length. The same or similar active spaces were used in previous high-level studies 17,18,22,32 of UF, UH, and UH 2 . The states included in the state-averaged CASSCF calculations for UF + were quintets and triplets with Λ = 0−6, correlating with the f 3 s configuration of U 2+ , and Λ = 0−8 quintets correlating with the f 3 d configuration.…”
Section: ■ Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incorporate relativistic effects, various approximations to the full Dirac Hamiltonian have been used in combination with all-electron (AE) basis sets . The literature contains many examples in which the Douglas−Kroll−Hess (DKH) approximation, the zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA), and other such approximations have been used to include relativistic effects in calculations on actinides. The use of specially designed effective core potentials in place of AE basis sets is another means of including relativistic effects . These relativistic effective core potentials (RECPs) and their associated valence basis sets have been used in calculations at the density functional theory (DFT), , second-order Møller−Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), and coupled cluster (CCSD(T)) levels of theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%