2016
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.12401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘All daughters and sons of the Republic’? Producing difference in French education

Abstract: Anthropological focus on public sphere debates can have the unintended consequence of reaffirming ideological oppositions ('secularism versus Islam') while ignoring other processes of difference production. In this article, I examine how French school employees build a logic of cultural otherness in an arena of uncertain social reproduction. Contrary to analyses of the French public sphere that emphasize the ideology of secular universalism, I argue that this dominant ideology has little purchase in the thick … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…School is also a site where difference is learned and reinforced (Kleinman 2016). Through the homogenizing nature of its curriculum, school also reifies a national history and national cultural repertoire, one that often excludes the contributions of immigrant-origin individuals (Keaton 2006;Lamont 1992).…”
Section: Overview Of Chaptersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…School is also a site where difference is learned and reinforced (Kleinman 2016). Through the homogenizing nature of its curriculum, school also reifies a national history and national cultural repertoire, one that often excludes the contributions of immigrant-origin individuals (Keaton 2006;Lamont 1992).…”
Section: Overview Of Chaptersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ritual and religion can be vibrant platforms for political re‐imaginings, whereas other ideologies may have the inverse effect. Julie Kleinman's analysis of secular universalism in French schools, for example, shows how secular ideals of inclusion often exacerbate categories of difference that exclude immigrant others, complicating a simplistic equation between secular states and cosmopolitan moral values (Kleinman ). In contrast, Liana Chua shows how playful combinations of developmental and Christian mythic‐historical frameworks in Malaysia allowed for imagining alternative futures, and relationships with government (Chua ).…”
Section: Edges Of the State And States On Edgementioning
confidence: 99%