1974
DOI: 10.1063/1.1682480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alkali molecular ion energies and expectation values in a model-potential treatment

Abstract: Success of quantum mechanical approximations for molecular geometries and electron-nuclear attraction expectation values: Gift of the Coulomb potential? J. Chem. Phys. 84, 4519 (1986); 10.1063/1.450024 Interpolated values of spectroscopic constants of asymmetric alkali molecules and molecular ions J. Chem. Phys. 62, 4753 (1975); 10.1063/1.430424Expectation values of the kinetic and potential energy of a diatomic molecule By using Hellman-type model potentials for alkali atoms, the many-electron problem of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
16
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results help in resolving these differences. For example, for the dissociation energy of (KRb) ϩ , the calculations of Bellomonte et al 28 give a value of 0.87 eV and the calculations of Valance 11 give a value of 0.53 eV, whereas our calculated value is 0.794. Generally, our predictions based on a simple, model potential with the correct asymptotic form and a hard core adjusted to incorporate the exchange effects at short distances, are expected to be quite reliable, particularly for systems involving larger atoms.…”
Section: A Energiesmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Our results help in resolving these differences. For example, for the dissociation energy of (KRb) ϩ , the calculations of Bellomonte et al 28 give a value of 0.87 eV and the calculations of Valance 11 give a value of 0.53 eV, whereas our calculated value is 0.794. Generally, our predictions based on a simple, model potential with the correct asymptotic form and a hard core adjusted to incorporate the exchange effects at short distances, are expected to be quite reliable, particularly for systems involving larger atoms.…”
Section: A Energiesmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…However, as has been pointed out by Bellomonte et al [4] the influence on the molecular levels is rather small. They depend somewhat on the choice of the states.…”
Section: Pacs: 3320nimentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The wavefunction ~ was expressed [4] in elliptical coordinates to be ~(~,fi)=(R2)"exp--(c~2+fi/t)R, whereas 2 = (rA + rRg)/R and # = (r A -rRg)/R. The wavefunction ~ was expressed [4] in elliptical coordinates to be ~(~,fi)=(R2)"exp--(c~2+fi/t)R, whereas 2 = (rA + rRg)/R and # = (r A -rRg)/R.…”
Section: Pacs: 3320nimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…basis set (4) used to fit its parameters, just this one has been the starting point for further calculations in several recent papers [13,[15][16][17]. The incorrectness of this M P is shown clearest, however, by comparing it with the results of MCGINN [14] what would have been possible since 1973 and is done in Table 1.…”
Section: (4)mentioning
confidence: 99%