Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry III 2007
DOI: 10.1016/b0-08-045047-4/00034-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alkali Metal Organometallics – Structure and Bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 487 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complex contains formal Li-N amido bonds in the range 1.967(3) to 2.064(3) A ˚(Table 1). These are comparable to those in previously characterised s-bonded Li amides 17,[25][26][27] and also in the related lithiated Scho¨llkopf's bis-lactim ethers, ranging from 1.965(3) to 2.089(5) A ˚.7,8 Each methoxy group acts as an internal donor, binding to a different Li cation to that of its corresponding N. The Li-O Me bond distances range from 1.975(3) to 2.059(3) A ˚, which is within the expected range of Li-O dative bonds. 8,28 This compares well with the chiral Li aza-enolate complex Li-2-acetylnaphthalene-SAMP-hydrazone (SAMP = (S)-1-amino-2-methoxymethylpyrrolidine), which has an internal solvating methoxy group with a Li-O bond length of 1.982(3) A ˚.29 Due to this internal solvation, only two thf molecules are incorporated into the 'tetrameric' structure.…”
Section: Solid-state Structuressupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The complex contains formal Li-N amido bonds in the range 1.967(3) to 2.064(3) A ˚(Table 1). These are comparable to those in previously characterised s-bonded Li amides 17,[25][26][27] and also in the related lithiated Scho¨llkopf's bis-lactim ethers, ranging from 1.965(3) to 2.089(5) A ˚.7,8 Each methoxy group acts as an internal donor, binding to a different Li cation to that of its corresponding N. The Li-O Me bond distances range from 1.975(3) to 2.059(3) A ˚, which is within the expected range of Li-O dative bonds. 8,28 This compares well with the chiral Li aza-enolate complex Li-2-acetylnaphthalene-SAMP-hydrazone (SAMP = (S)-1-amino-2-methoxymethylpyrrolidine), which has an internal solvating methoxy group with a Li-O bond length of 1.982(3) A ˚.29 Due to this internal solvation, only two thf molecules are incorporated into the 'tetrameric' structure.…”
Section: Solid-state Structuressupporting
confidence: 87%
“…1 A long-standing problem in the characterization of chalcogenalkali complexes stems from their poor solubility, tendency toward aggregation, inherent decomposition, and the formation of amorphous solids. 2 Since these functionalities serve as single-source precursors to semiconducting metal chalcogenides, 3 quantum dots, 4 gas-phase and in-solution deposition methods of metal chalcogenide films, and useful transfer reagents, 5,6 the quest for novel chalcogen-alkali compounds underscores their relevance. The structural chemistry of metal-alkali alkoxides and aryloxides has been widely studied, as opposed to that of their heavier chalcogen congeners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural chemistry of metal-alkali alkoxides and aryloxides has been widely studied, as opposed to that of their heavier chalcogen congeners. 2,7 As far as heavier chalcogen-alkali complexes are concerned, the use of multidentate donors such as crown ethers leads to the stabilization of [M(18-crown-6)(thf) 2 ][SMes*] (M ) Na, K; Mes* ) 2,4,6-t Bu 3 C 6 H 2 ; THF ) tetrahydrofuran) thiolates and the (thf) 2 ][SeMes*] selenolate. 8 It was found that these compounds can behave in the solid state as separated or as contact ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alkali metals Li, Na, and K show a multifaceted coordination chemistry. This is largely due to the relatively high ionic character of their bonding interactions, which results in a pronounced flexibility in terms of coordination numbers and geometries . In addition, these metals have only a moderate preference for bonding interactions with either hard or soft donor functionalities (e.g., O - or N -based donors vs arenes). , Consequently, the coordination chemistry of alkali metal complexes of monoanionic, ditopic ligands with hard and soft binding sites can be challenging to predict.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%