2014
DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.82.851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alkali Ion Transport in Tavorite-Type ABTO4X (A: Li, Na; B-T: Al-P, Mg-S; X: F)

Abstract: The promise of high safety and stability in solid-type electrolytes has prompted many battery researchers to find candidate inorganic compounds to replace existing liquid/polymer-based electrolytes. In this report, the alkali ion transport in tavorite-type ABTO 4 X (A: Li, Na; B-T: Al-P, Mg-S; X: F) is investigated by ab initio calculation, bond valence path approach, and void space analysis in order to explore their viability as solid electrolytes for all-solid state Li/Na ion batteries. Results from nudged e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are also worthy of consideration for practical battery applications. , The reduced migration energy values for both structures may be attributed to the different repulsive Li–Me (Me = Mn, Ni) and Me–Me interactions . The predicted migration energy values are also comparable to these of practical battery materials, for example, LiFePO 4 (0.41 eV), LiFe 0.875 Mn 0.125 PO 4 (0.67 eV), VOPO 4 (0.46 eV), LiAlPO 4 F (0.55 eV), LiMn 0.875 Fe 0.125 PO 4 (0.66 eV), LiVPO 4 F (0.4 eV), and LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 0.2 (0.5 eV). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These values are also worthy of consideration for practical battery applications. , The reduced migration energy values for both structures may be attributed to the different repulsive Li–Me (Me = Mn, Ni) and Me–Me interactions . The predicted migration energy values are also comparable to these of practical battery materials, for example, LiFePO 4 (0.41 eV), LiFe 0.875 Mn 0.125 PO 4 (0.67 eV), VOPO 4 (0.46 eV), LiAlPO 4 F (0.55 eV), LiMn 0.875 Fe 0.125 PO 4 (0.66 eV), LiVPO 4 F (0.4 eV), and LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 0.2 (0.5 eV). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…To further employ this understanding of the influence of lattice dynamics on ion mobility, in this article, we present the result of a high-throughput (HT) study of more than 1,000 Li-containing compounds using a lattice dynamic descriptor called the lithium-phonon band center, which is a measure of the average vibrational frequency of the lithium sublattice and has been proposed as a descriptor for the migration barrier or enthalpy of migration of lithium conductors in LISICON and olivine families (Muy et al, 2018b), in addition to several correlations between electronic structures, lattice dynamics, migration barrier, and electrochemical stability (Figure 1). Previous HT studies employed descriptors that were designed essentially based on static structural features (Avdeev et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2015) or using machine learning techniques to capture underlying correlations between the input features and the target properties from a database (Jalem et al, 2013;Sendek et al, 2018Sendek et al, , 2017. For instance, Wang et al (Wang et al, 2015) have proposed that a body-center cubic (BCC) structure provides the ideal framework for Li-ion conduction, where the deviation from the ideal BCC structure can be used as a descriptor for faster Li-ion conductors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example is Na + ion batteries which can offer a potential cost advantage because of the almost inexhaustible supply of Na. Another interesting point is the similarity between Na and Li intercalation chemistry which allows for similar compounds to be used, in both battery types. , Generally though, the relatively larger Na + ion (vs Li + ion) is often viewed to pose a problem for ionic conduction. However, several Na-based materials have been reported already to demonstrate good or even better ionic mobility (than their Li counterpart), facilitated by the large enough tunnels and void spaces in a variety of structures. High-voltage novel cathodes, such as Na 3 V 2 O 2 x (PO 4 ) 2 F 3–2 x and Na 2 Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 , have been developed as well that address the issue of lower energy density in Na-based systems stemming from the higher reduction potential of Na metal (−2.7 V vs standard hydrogen electrode or SHE for Na as compared to −3.0 V vs SHE for Li) and the higher equivalent weight of Na (vs Li). , Recently, safety enhancement of Li/Na batteries has been pursued by substituting conventional organic-/liquid-based electrolytes with inorganic or solid-based ones. Up to date, NASICON-type (Na Super Ionic CONductor) compounds and Na β″-alumina are considered as among the few that show promise for solid electrolyte use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%