2010
DOI: 10.1097/hp.0b013e3181b186ff
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALIMENTARY TRACT ABSORPTION (f 1 VALUES) FOR RADIONUCLIDES IN LOCAL AND REGIONAL FALLOUT FROM NUCLEAR TESTS

Abstract: This paper presents gastrointestinal absorption fractions (f 1 values) for estimating internal doses from local and regional fallout radionuclides due to nuclear tests. The choice of f 1 values are based on specific circumstances of weapons test conditions and a review of reported f 1 values for elements in different physical and chemical states. Special attention is given to fallout from nuclear tests conducted at the Marshall Islands. We make a distinction between the f 1 values for intakes of radioactive ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimation of doses from the acute intakes used dose coefficients as described that were derived from accepted international biokinetic models and adjusted for f1 values specific for radionuclides ingested in fallout particles (see Ibrahim et al 2010). Annual doses from acute intakes at each atoll varied primarily according to the amount of deposition from the tests conducted in a given year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Estimation of doses from the acute intakes used dose coefficients as described that were derived from accepted international biokinetic models and adjusted for f1 values specific for radionuclides ingested in fallout particles (see Ibrahim et al 2010). Annual doses from acute intakes at each atoll varied primarily according to the amount of deposition from the tests conducted in a given year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only parameter values that have been changed are those of the alimentary tract absorption fractions (f 1 ), which have been taken from the review by Ibrahim et al (2010), that are specifically related to the intakes of radionuclides in particulate fallout. An established computer code (Eckerman et al 2006) was used to solve the ICRP biokinetic models and to provide annual dose coefficients for all organs and age groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods used in this study for estimating acute intakes of fallout radionuclides and resulting doses are based on: (1) the estimates of test-, atoll-, and radionuclide-specific deposition densities discussed in Beck et al (2010); (2) historical measurements of 131I in pooled samples of urine collected from adults about two weeks after the Bravo test (Harris 1954; Harris et al 2010); and (3) assessment of appropriate values of gastrointestinal uptake for the radionuclides present in fallout particles (Ibrahim et al 2010). The assessment of internal doses was composed of the following six steps: (1) estimation of the intake of 131I by populations on Rongelap, Ailinginae, and Rongerik, following the Bravo test using historical bioassay data; (2) estimation of the intake of 137Cs at the same three atolls based on the ratios of 137Cs to 131I calculated by Hicks (1981, 1984) but corrected for fractionation; (3) estimation of the deposition density of 137Cs following each of 20 tests on all inhabited atolls; (4) estimation of the intake of 137Cs at all inhabited atolls assuming that the ratio of intake to deposition was the same at all atolls; (5) estimation of intakes of all radionuclides considered at all inhabited atolls following each nuclear test; and (6) estimation of annual and cumulative radiation absorbed doses to four organs (RBM, thyroid, stomach, colon) of representative persons for all relevant birth years.…”
Section: Summary Of Methods and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bioassay data important to internal dose estimation (Harris et al 2010) and interpretation of intake-related dosimetric factors (Ibrahim et al 2010); and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%