2011
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201110605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alignment of transmembrane regions in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator chloride channel pore

Abstract: Different transmembrane (TM) α helices are known to line the pore of the cystic fibrosis TM conductance regulator (CFTR) Cl− channel. However, the relative alignment of these TMs in the three-dimensional structure of the pore is not known. We have used patch-clamp recording to investigate the accessibility of cytoplasmically applied cysteine-reactive reagents to cysteines introduced along the length of the pore-lining first TM (TM1) of a cysteine-less variant of CFTR. We find that methanethiosulfonate (MTS) re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

17
99
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
17
99
4
Order By: Relevance
“…5, C and E), in E1371Q mutant channels, the K i for the double cysteine mutants was not significantly different from the single cysteine mutants (Fig. 5, B-E tional role lining the inner vestibule (3,13,14). However, in our hands, fewer side chains from TM1 line the inner vestibule (13), and when investigating potential Cd 2ϩ bridge formation involving this TM, we were limited to cysteines substituted at two positions (Lys-95 and Gln-98).…”
Section: Metal Bridge Formation Between Tms 6 and 12-pore-liningmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5, C and E), in E1371Q mutant channels, the K i for the double cysteine mutants was not significantly different from the single cysteine mutants (Fig. 5, B-E tional role lining the inner vestibule (3,13,14). However, in our hands, fewer side chains from TM1 line the inner vestibule (13), and when investigating potential Cd 2ϩ bridge formation involving this TM, we were limited to cysteines substituted at two positions (Lys-95 and Gln-98).…”
Section: Metal Bridge Formation Between Tms 6 and 12-pore-liningmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, although experimental evidence for these different kinds of movement has been put forward, the relative mechanistic importance of these movements for the process of channel opening and closing is not known. Evidence for conformational changes in individual TMs within the inner vestibule of the pore during channel gating is mainly two-dimensional in nature, coming from state-dependent differences in the accessibility of cytoplasmically applied cysteine reactive methanethiosulfonate reagents to cysteine side chains introduced into TMs 1 (8,9,13,14), 6 (8, 9, 11, 15), 11 (10), and 12 (12,16). However, how the relative positions of these TM changes in three-dimensional space during channel gating have not previously been investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on functional data and homology models, CFTR has been predicted to contain five functional domains: two membranespanning domains (MSDs), each including six transmembrane (TM) helices; two nucleotide binding domains (NBD1 and NBD2); and a unique regulatory (R) domain, which carries multiple protein kinase A (PKA) consensus phosphorylation sites and is unique to CFTR in the ABC superfamily (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Functional studies from multiple groups have suggested that TM6 plays an essential role and TM12 contributes less to anion conduction and permeation properties in the CFTR channel pore (7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%