2017
DOI: 10.25115/ejrep.v6i16.1296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alignment of Standards and Assessment: A theoretical and empirical study of methods for alignment

Abstract: Introduction. In a standards-based school-system alignment of policy documents with stan-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This model was defined on the basis of constructive learning theory, which advocates use of assessments that cover both conceptual knowledge and programming competencies. Other studies propose lesson plans associated with course‐specific learning outcomes, which would increase student learning and impact their performance in assessments aligned with standards and classroom instruction (Lucas, Dippenaar, & Toit, ; Näsström & Henriksson, ). Assessments should be defined in a learner‐centred approach or as an active engagement to employ student in solving authentic problems, to support constructive alignment.…”
Section: Educational Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was defined on the basis of constructive learning theory, which advocates use of assessments that cover both conceptual knowledge and programming competencies. Other studies propose lesson plans associated with course‐specific learning outcomes, which would increase student learning and impact their performance in assessments aligned with standards and classroom instruction (Lucas, Dippenaar, & Toit, ; Näsström & Henriksson, ). Assessments should be defined in a learner‐centred approach or as an active engagement to employ student in solving authentic problems, to support constructive alignment.…”
Section: Educational Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La clasificación del contenido se realizó con base en la taxonomía revisada de Bloom (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001), ya que se considera como un modelo inclusivo, confiable en los estudios de alineamiento de estándares (Näsström & Henriksson, 2008). De acuerdo con esta taxonomía, cada componente a valorar (parámetros e indicadores) se analizó a la luz de una matriz de dos dimensiones, en el eje vertical los cuatro tipos de conocimiento y en el horizontal las seis categorías del proceso cognitivo.…”
Section: Procedimientounclassified
“…The term "alignment" [12] is summarized as when two or all three components in a certain education system are consistent [13], are in agreement [14], are matched [15], or work together [16]. See Fig.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%