Alignment of Continuous Auditory and Visual Distractor Stimuli Is Leading to an Increased Performance

Abstract

Information across different senses can affect our behavior in both positive and negative ways. Stimuli aligned with a target stimulus can lead to improved behavioral performances, while competing, transient stimuli often negatively affect our task performance. But what about subtle changes in task-irrelevant multisensory stimuli? Within this experiment we tested the effect of the alignment of subtle auditory and visual distractor stimuli on the performance of detection and discrimination tasks respectively. Participants performed either a detection or a discrimination task on a centrally presented Gabor patch, while being simultaneously subjected to a random dot kinematogram, which alternated its color from green to red with a frequency of 7.5 Hz and a continuous tone, which was either a frequency modulated pure tone for the audiovisual congruent and incongruent conditions or white noise for the visual control condition. While the modulation frequency of the pure tone initially differed from the modulation frequency of the random dot kinematogram, the modulation frequencies of both stimuli could align after a variable delay, and we measured accuracy and reaction times around the possible alignment time. We found increases in accuracy for the audiovisual congruent condition suggesting subtle alignments of multisensory background stimuli can increase performance on the current task.

Willingness of Middle Eastern public to receive COVID-19 vaccines

“…The application of such strict measures has caused an unprecedented disruption of the global societal and economic activities ( Asante and Mills, 2020 ), and affected the mental health of the general population ( Ozamiz-Etxebarria et al, 2020 , Rossi et al, 2020 ). Therefore, this necessitates the search for a more effective measure to control or possibly end COVID-19 pandemic.…”

Multisensory signals inhibit pupillary light reflex: Evidence from pupil oscillation

“…Although dependent on stimulus eccentricity, fusion of multisensory inputs has been proposed independent of task relevance. Previous studies have reported that even task‐irrelevant cross‐modal signals can exert a stronger interference on the currently performed task compared with a unimodal distractor (Heeman et al., 2016; Krause et al., 2012; Matusz et al., 2015, but an improvement in Mühlberg & Müller, 2020 and no effect in Experiment 4 of Lunn et al., 2019). Despite that no interference on the RSVP task was found in the present study, the pupillary light reflex induced by the visual stimuli that were task‐irrelevant and out of attentional focus was inhibited by temporally congruent tone pulses in Experiment 4.…”

“…So far, the visual flicker was always required to be attended as it was task‐relevant. Given several studies have found that even task‐irrelevant bimodal signals showed some signs of fusion relative to unimodal signals (Heeman et al., 2016; Krause et al., 2012; Matusz et al., 2015; Mühlberg & Müller, 2020), it is hypothesized that the inhibition of pupillary light reflex would not be affected despite the visual and auditory stimuli are task‐irrelevant and out of attentional focus. We conducted Experiment 4 to test this hypothesis.…”

Different Markov chains modulate visual stimuli processing in a Go-Go experiment in 2D, 3D, and augmented reality

“…This can be interpreted as a clear difference to the bottom-up and top-down 2D mechanism interaction with the 3D and AR modalities, which would be expected in cross-modal tasks (e.g., Parmentier et al, 2010;Mayas et al, 2014;Vasilev et al, 2019;Mühlberg and Müller, 2020).…”