Aligning workforce development &amp; software process improvement strategy for accelerated adoption of software engineering capability

Mason, James David

doi:10.1109/csee.2003.1191352

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many previous works about port selection and competitiveness have employed a number of common factors directly related to port physical conditions and operational activities such as port location, infrastructure, superstructure, productivity, service quality, cost, marketing and hinterland accessibility (Willingale, 1982;Brudg and Daley, 1986;Tongzon, 2001, Mason, 2003Yeo et al, 2006;and Chang et al, 2008).…”

Section: Port Competitiveness (Pc)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of supply chain orientation in container ports: liners’ perspective

Lee¹,

Kim²

2009

Journal of International Logistics and Trade

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper employs the concept of supply chain orientation in container port management and empirically tests whether the measurement models proposed in some notable previous research have universal application. In addition, this study attempts to identify any significant causal relationships between port supply chain orientation and port performance from the view point of shipping companies. In the current study port supply chain orientation was found to have limited effect on customer satisfaction and port competitiveness, which might has been caused by some implemental and practical issues. However, the present study reveals the potential importance of port supply chain management by empirically demonstrating that “closer relationship with shipping lines” and “innovative value added service” could function as critical components for container ports/terminals to improve customer satisfaction and enhance their competitiveness.

show abstract

Section: Port Competitiveness (Pc)mentioning

confidence: 99%