Aligning Urban Policy with Climate Action in the Global South: Are Brazilian Cities Considering Climate Emergency in Local Planning Practice?

Abstract

Climate change is the biggest global threat of our time. As a signatory nation of the Paris Agreement, Brazil has made a climate action commitment, and expressed its nationally determined contribution to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 37%. The Brazilian population is highly urban, and Brazilian cities are mostly responsible for greenhouse gas emissions, and the worst effects of global warming are experienced in cities. Hence, the fulfillment of the Brazilian climate commitments depends on the active engagement of municipalities. Nevertheless, the Brazilian national government does not monitor local climate actions, and it is not clear how local urban policy is aligned with climate action. In order to bridge this gap, this study tackles the question of: “Are, and if yes how, cities considering the climate emergency in their local planning mechanisms?” This question is investigated by placing five major Brazilian cities under the microscope. The methodological approach includes literature review and applied qualitative analysis to scrutinize how climate issues and actions are factored in urban planning regulations to verify if and to what extent local policies contribute to the fulfillment of the Brazilian nationally determined contribution, and sustainable development goals. The results disclose that investigated cities have adequately incorporated climatic issues in their urban planning mechanisms. However, policy concentrates more on adaptation rather than mitigation, and policy implementation yet to be realized.

Contributions and Risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Building Smarter Cities: Insights from a Systematic Review of the Literature

“…In a rapidly urbanizing world, climate change and the misuse and mismanagement of land and resources are triggering natural disasters and increasing their intensity [3,4]. Subsequently, cities are becoming frequently subjected to the direct or indirect impacts of natural disasters-for example, the 2019 Amazon Rainforest fires [5] and the 2020 Australian bushfires [6]. There have been numerous top-down (e.g., the Paris Agreement, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, UN's Sustainable Development Goals, UN Climate Change Conferences) and bottom-up (e.g., school strikes, extinction rebellion protests, climate emergency declarations) attempts to raise awareness and develop policy actions to address the climate emergency [7,8].…”

Local Drivers of Anthropogenic Climate Change: Quantifying the Impact through a Remote Sensing Approach in Brisbane

“…The mix of urban and rural land uses accompanied by ambiguous land use patterns in peri-urban areas appears to quantify GHG emissions, and their corresponding impacts on GWP are challenging. Hence, quantifying peri-urbanization-driven GHG emissions remains unincorporated in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)'s estimated climate change scenarios [75,76]. Still, globally occurring constant peri-urbanization to nearby greenfield sites and the corresponding changes in ESV and GHG emissions most likely will have an increasing climate change impact [77].…”

How Does Peri-Urbanization Trigger Climate Change Vulnerabilities? An Investigation of the Dhaka Megacity in Bangladesh

“…On that very point, Ahsan [76] urged the adoption of area-specific growth policies in securing the basic rights for climate migrants of Bangladesh. Similarly, developing sound climate change mitigation policies is deemed critical to minimize climate migrant numbers across the globe [77].…”