2022
DOI: 10.1080/08959420.2022.2049570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aligning Policy, Place and Public Value: Planning Age Friendly Cities in Municipal Organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the US, for example, primary attention has been focused on the physical layer, as seen in the American Planning Association Guide for Age Friendly Communities [ 26 ]. However, research on rural communities has shown that the physical layer is not enough, and more attention needs to be given to services [ 27 , 28 ], social engagement [ 29 , 30 , 31 ] and the role of local government [ 20 , 32 ]. Social engagement may be especially important in rural communities, where the built environment and services are lacking [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the US, for example, primary attention has been focused on the physical layer, as seen in the American Planning Association Guide for Age Friendly Communities [ 26 ]. However, research on rural communities has shown that the physical layer is not enough, and more attention needs to be given to services [ 27 , 28 ], social engagement [ 29 , 30 , 31 ] and the role of local government [ 20 , 32 ]. Social engagement may be especially important in rural communities, where the built environment and services are lacking [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also based in the US, the article by Keyes et al (2022) examines the process of planning age-friendly cities in municipal systems. They draw on evidence from a case study of a mapping project in San Antonio, Texas.…”
Section: Partnerships and Multisectoral Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another body of work addresses general planning and policy-making for age-friendliness often using literature reviews or large surveys to examine what has been done or what could be proposed (Keating, Eales and Phillips 2013; Warner and Rukus 2013; American Planning Association 2014; Warner, Homsy and Morken 2017; Warner, Xu and Morken 2017; Zhang, Warner and Firestone 2019; Forsyth, Molinsky and Kan 2019; Keyes and Benavides 2019; Warner and Zhang 2021). Such work has both drawn on and contributed to debates about the wide range of approaches to age-friendliness and ideas for innovations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%