2019
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1610455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aligning learning design and learning analytics through instructor involvement: a MOOC case study

Abstract: With the emergence of MOOCs, there is a growing interest in prediction research. Most existing predictive models do not consider the context for which they are intended, thus resulting in limited impact. Learning design (LD) can provide a contextual understanding for the design of predictive models in collaboration with the instructors, maximizing their potential for supporting learning. This paper presents the findings of a mixed-methods research that explored the potentials emerging from aligning LD and LA d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But, more importantly, the results from this research work also suggest that certain learning activities, within peer review learning designs, are key for generating the data needed to obtain learning analytics indicators about significant regulatory processes. This implication reinforces the importance of aligning learning design and learning analytics [4]. An important implication for research is that the findings of this research suggest theory-based indicators to measure engagement not only in SRL but also in SSRL and Co-RL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…But, more importantly, the results from this research work also suggest that certain learning activities, within peer review learning designs, are key for generating the data needed to obtain learning analytics indicators about significant regulatory processes. This implication reinforces the importance of aligning learning design and learning analytics [4]. An important implication for research is that the findings of this research suggest theory-based indicators to measure engagement not only in SRL but also in SSRL and Co-RL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Similarly, number of discussion counts did not matter in the first course, whereas they were predictive in several models in the third course. We argue that this inconsistency is associated with the different learning design applied in each course [49]. That is, for example, the way discussion forums are used pedagogically and connected with the peer-reviewed activity may differ from one course to another, which may create a weaker/stronger association between student engagement in discussions and the peer reviews.…”
Section: Rq1: the Predictive Power Of Past Course Activities And The mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, when involved in the process, instructors may be inclined to use the actionable models to improve their teaching practice. Several research highlighted the benefits emerging from involving instructors in the loop of designing predictive models [35], [49].…”
Section: Implications For Theory and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the work by Ruipérez-Valiente et al [20] introduced a learning analytics tool implemented for Open edX, called ANALYSE, which provides useful visualizations for teachers' feedback backed by pedagogical foundations. The work by Er et al [21] uses learning analytics to design a predictive analytics solution to involve instructors in the design process of an MOOC. Finally, the work by Tabaa and Medouri [22] focuses on creating a learning analytics system for massive open online courses based on big data techniques, such as Hadoop, in order to target "at-risk" students.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%