2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aligning Indigenous values and cultural ecosystem services for ecosystem accounting: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent theoretical frameworks have taken an increasingly holistic approach by considering cultural ecosystem services and indigenous perspectives that may not lend themselves to capitalist systems of monetary valuation (Normyle, Vardon, & Doran, 2023). Recently, authors have argued for the importance of including a relational perspective (Stålhammar & Thoren, 2019) which recognizes that people value nature in the context of how they relate to other human beings, further breaking down the false dichotomy between “human systems” and “natural systems” (Chan et al., 2012a, 2012b; Chan et al., 2016; Pascual et al., 2017).…”
Section: Potential Consequences Of Human Exceptionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent theoretical frameworks have taken an increasingly holistic approach by considering cultural ecosystem services and indigenous perspectives that may not lend themselves to capitalist systems of monetary valuation (Normyle, Vardon, & Doran, 2023). Recently, authors have argued for the importance of including a relational perspective (Stålhammar & Thoren, 2019) which recognizes that people value nature in the context of how they relate to other human beings, further breaking down the false dichotomy between “human systems” and “natural systems” (Chan et al., 2012a, 2012b; Chan et al., 2016; Pascual et al., 2017).…”
Section: Potential Consequences Of Human Exceptionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESV equivalent method, which is based on the current scale developed by experts, has some credibility. Based on this method, China has studied ESV from the scale of river basins (Liu et al, 2023), urban agglomerations (Gong et al, 2023), provinces and cities (Normyle et al, 2023), the country (Sharma et al, 2023), etc. At present, the use of an economic value assessment mainly follows the ESV assessment model established by Costanza et al According to the actual situation in China, Xie Gaodi et al developed a table of ecological service value per unit area based on this model, which has been widely used (Jia et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…包含着功能提供服务,服务产生益处,益处呈现价值的递进关系,即级联模型 [45] 。由此 明确了 CES 可以凭借服务、益处和价值等多种途径得到认知与表征 [46] 。第三,将 CES 评 估更好地和社会现实相结合,评估过程中充分考虑利益相关方要求 [47] ,顾及公平正义。 例如通过人口-收入-环境压力/偏好 (Population-Income-Environmental Pressure/Prefer-ence,PIEP) 框架对 CES 需求进行精细化制图 [48] ,提出更为多元民主的评估框架 [49] ,识 别服务受益的不平等 [50] ,从当地土著人民的角度出发进行 CES 评估等 [51] 。在评估时将特 定的 CES 价值类型进行精细化处理 [52] ,考虑景观因素 [53] 、人类干预 [54] 、特定公共卫生事件 等因素的影响 [55] 。第四,深入认识 CES 的关系性和交互性,推陈出新动态性评估思路。 在评估中更加注重获取时间序列数据 [40] ,以及借助新的技术方法和媒体大数据等渠道获 取更具有实效性的数据 [56]…”
unclassified