Aligning Academic Continuing Medical Education With Quality Improvement

Abstract

The recent health care quality improvement (QI) movement has called for significant changes to the way that health care is delivered and taught in academic medical centers (AMCs). This movement also has affected academic continuing medical education (CME). In January 2011, to better align the CME and QI efforts of AMCs, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) launched a pilot initiative called Aligning and Educating for Quality (ae4Q). The goal of this pilot was to assist 11 AMCs as they moved to a more integrated model of continuous performance improvement by aligning their quality measurement and improvement with their continuing education endeavors. In this article, the authors describe the development of the ae4Q pilot and the resulting outcomes that have led to ongoing improvements.During the 18-month pilot, AAMC consultants conducted readiness assessments and on-site visits and provided consultation services and Web-based resources based on the AMC's needs. Following these interventions at each site, they then conducted both interviews with participants and postintervention assessment surveys to measure the impact of the pilot. Findings included demonstrated increases in the alignment of CME and QI, a greater use of quality data in CME design and delivery, and a greater use of CME as an intervention for clinical improvement. Two sites also attributed measureable improved clinical outcomes to their participation in the ae4Q pilot. The AAMC has used these findings to create resources and ongoing services to support AMCs as they pursue efforts to align QI and CME.

Leveraging Trainees to Improve Quality and Safety at the Point of Care

“…However, through expert consensus, we developed and implemented in our respective institutions three models with high face validity, which incorporated established best practices for teaching QI/ PS through a combination of didactic and experiential learning, coupled with strong role modeling. 13,16,20 The steps for implementing these models that we articulate in Table 2 may appear logical and seamless, but in reality, the barriers discussed earlier present real challenges to integrating residents into institutional QI/PS efforts. Faculty development for frontline clinician-educators in accordance with their interests, roles, and prior experiences with QI is critical to encourage them to model QI principles in daily work.…”

Quality Improvement–Focused Departmental Grand Rounds Reports: A Strategy to Engage General Surgery Residents

“…Another option to increase resources available to surgery residents might be to partner with outside groups interested in this work, specifically the Association of American Medical Colleges Aligning and Educating for Quality initiative. 22 …”

Categorising and enhancing the impacts of continuing professional development to improve performance and health outcomes

“…The Institute of Medicine's report ‘Redesigning Continuing Education in the Health Professions’ stated: ‘… the continuing professional development system will benefit when its providers and researchers collaborate with other professionals in the quality improvement community; efficiencies gained from such collaborations could yield important benefits to patients’ . Initiatives like Aligning and Educating for Quality offer strategic directions for partnerships between groups that may, thorough collaboration, enable better identification of professional practice gaps and implementation of improvement plans to achieve meaningful change in performance and patient outcomes. These partnerships may also spawn a new type of ‘educational handover’ whereby physicians use CPD to focus on learning to improve with QI supporting the ‘doing of improvement’ through the use of QI tools and processes in the physician's workplace …”