1992
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-75901992000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algumas observaçoes sobre a margem de contribuiçao

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence the 35.6% contribution margin index for apparent satiety and that of 29.4% for self‐feeders would indicate a bigger share of the revenue intended to cover fixed costs and investment profit. The decision to choose the best food management should be based on the unitary contribution margin and the contribution margin index because they indicate the percentage available to cover fixed costs and to still remunerate the invested capital (Dias, 1992; Maher, 2001). Studies that have considered the efficiency of production systems for different commercial species, such as tambaqui, indicate variations in the contribution margin from 28% to 72% (Dantas‐Filho, 2017; Martin et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence the 35.6% contribution margin index for apparent satiety and that of 29.4% for self‐feeders would indicate a bigger share of the revenue intended to cover fixed costs and investment profit. The decision to choose the best food management should be based on the unitary contribution margin and the contribution margin index because they indicate the percentage available to cover fixed costs and to still remunerate the invested capital (Dias, 1992; Maher, 2001). Studies that have considered the efficiency of production systems for different commercial species, such as tambaqui, indicate variations in the contribution margin from 28% to 72% (Dantas‐Filho, 2017; Martin et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final price per kg of fish (FPF) of US$ 1.08/kg was used, estimated according to current market prices, and the final biomass (FB) to calculate the estimated revenue (ER) per treatment (ER = FB × FPF) (Varian, 2016). Subsequently, the unitary contribution margin (UCM = (FPF−VUC) and the contribution margin index (CMI = [100%−(VUC−FPF) were calculated for each analysed food strategy (Dias, 1992). The CMI indicates the remaining portion of revenue to be used to cover the fixed costs and profit of the production in question.…”
Section: Feed Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The investment criteria calculated were: net present value (NPV) (equation 1), which represents the current return on the investment according to its duration (Rezende & Oliveira, 2001); internal rate of return (IRR) (equation 2), which denotes a discount rate that results in a zero NPV (Silva et al, 2007); average cost (AC) (equation 3), which is a result of the division between net production and costs in the horizon period (Silva et al, 2007); and finally, the break-even point (BEP) (equation 4), it is a number of sales which results in an equal amount of revenues and costs; therefore, there is no profit or debt at the BEP (Dias, 1992…”
Section: Economic Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A margem de contribuição é a parcela necessária para cobrir o custo fixo e proporcionar o lucro, também chamado de contribuição para o lucro (DIAS, 1992). Ela é obtida através da subtração do custo variável unitário do preço de venda ou o valor cobrado do serviço.…”
Section: 7margem De Contribuiçãounclassified