2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0956796800003877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms with polynomial interpretation termination proof

Abstract: We study the effect of polynomial interpretation termination proofs of deterministic (resp. non-deterministic) algorithms defined by con uent (resp. non-con uent) rewrite systems over data structures which include strings, lists and trees, and we classify them according to the interpretations of the constructors. This leads to the definition of six function classes which turn out to be exactly the deterministic (resp. non-deterministic) polynomial time, linear exponential time and linear doubly exponentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
90
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
3
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e.g. [7,20]. However, direct applications of orders have two main drawbacks: The obtained bounds are often far too high to be useful and there are many TRSs that cannot be oriented strictly with standard orders amenable to automation, cf.…”
Section: Reduction Pair Processormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e.g. [7,20]. However, direct applications of orders have two main drawbacks: The obtained bounds are often far too high to be useful and there are many TRSs that cannot be oriented strictly with standard orders amenable to automation, cf.…”
Section: Reduction Pair Processormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While termination of term rewrite systems (TRSs) is well studied, only recently first results were obtained which adapt termination techniques in order to obtain polynomial complexity bounds automatically, e.g., [2][3][4][5]7,10,[17][18][19][22][23][24]26,29,30]. Here, [3,[17][18][19] consider the dependency pair (DP) method [1,11,12,16], which is one of the most popular termination techniques for TRSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. [7,17]. However, direct applications of orders have two main drawbacks: The obtained bounds are often far too high to be useful and there are many TRSs that cannot be oriented strictly with standard orders amenable to automation, cf.…”
Section: Reduction Pair Processormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensures that the mapping from constructor ground terms t ∈ T (Σ \Σ d , ∅) to their interpretations is in O(|t|), cf. [7,17]. Note that the interpretations in Ex.…”
Section: Then the Following Processor Is Sound: Proc( D S R ) = (Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation