2006
DOI: 10.3846/16487788.2006.9635930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms Improving Flying Qualities of General Aviation Aircraft

Abstract: The dynamic growth of general aviation as a mean of transport over medium distances means that people having no extraordinary qualifications or extraordinary physical or mental abilities more often pilot such types of airplanes. This phenomenon creates the necessity of giving planes flying qualities that allow them to be safely piloted by ordinary people. One way of solving this problem is equipping airplanes with fly‐by‐wire control systems that modify their handling qualities. Then the computer included into… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the plane's handling characteristics were modified for both altitude and heading channel, let us focus only one element of foregoing maneuver – the altitude stabilization. During the test flight, the pilot, who is the SPS −1 system's operator controlled the airplane using different control modes (Rogalski and Dolega, 2006). Selected fragments of the real flights are shown in Figure 5: Mode I. Deflections of control surfaces were proportional to the position of the control device.…”
Section: Sample Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the plane's handling characteristics were modified for both altitude and heading channel, let us focus only one element of foregoing maneuver – the altitude stabilization. During the test flight, the pilot, who is the SPS −1 system's operator controlled the airplane using different control modes (Rogalski and Dolega, 2006). Selected fragments of the real flights are shown in Figure 5: Mode I. Deflections of control surfaces were proportional to the position of the control device.…”
Section: Sample Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, plus automatic trimmer (pitch moment equilibrium).Simplified control, forming filter is used – Level II (Figure 8):as No. 3, but nonlinear function was used (Figure 9, curve c); andforming filter described by Rogalski and Dołęga's (2006) formula was used: Equation 1 where, U MW = δ – required displacement of aerodynamics control surface, U P – stick displacement, k – weight factor of SI rate of movement. Properties of forming filter are graphically shown by 3D‐surface in Figure 9, surface d .Normal flight control system operation – Level I (Figure 10):indirect control “Rate command/attitude hold” type (for k FF =0); andas No.…”
Section: Simulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…forming filter described by Rogalski and Dołęga's (2006) formula was used: Equation 1 where, U MW = δ – required displacement of aerodynamics control surface, U P – stick displacement, k – weight factor of SI rate of movement. Properties of forming filter are graphically shown by 3D‐surface in Figure 9, surface d .…”
Section: Simulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand they are usually not professional pilots and often have not much aviation experience. They represent a different approach to aircraft control process [5] than professional pilots do. They also expect plane's features to be a little different than professionals do.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%