2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2013.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for unipolar and generalized split graphs

Abstract: A graph G = (V, E) is a unipolar graph if there exists a partition V = V 1 ∪ V 2 such that, V 1 is a clique and V 2 induces the disjoint union of cliques. The complement-closed class of generalized split graphs contains those graphs G such that either G or the complement of G is unipolar. Generalized split graphs are a large subclass of perfect graphs. In fact, it has been shown that almost all C 5 -free (and hence, almost all perfect graphs) are generalized split graphs. In this paper we present a recognition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For colourings, we explicitly find a minimum colouring in each co-bipartite graph G[C 0 ∪ C i ], and such colourings can be fitted together using no more colours, since C 0 is a clique cutset. Assume that G[C 0 ∪ C i ] contains n i vertices and m i edges, so each n i ≤ n and The approach of Eschen and Wang [5] is very similar, and they give more details, but unfortunately there is a problem with their analysis, and a corrected version of their analysis yields O(n 3.5 / log n) time, instead of the claimed O(n 2.5 / log n). In order to see the problem consider the case when the input graph is a split graph with an equitable partition.…”
Section: Algorithms For Random Perfect Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For colourings, we explicitly find a minimum colouring in each co-bipartite graph G[C 0 ∪ C i ], and such colourings can be fitted together using no more colours, since C 0 is a clique cutset. Assume that G[C 0 ∪ C i ] contains n i vertices and m i edges, so each n i ≤ n and The approach of Eschen and Wang [5] is very similar, and they give more details, but unfortunately there is a problem with their analysis, and a corrected version of their analysis yields O(n 3.5 / log n) time, instead of the claimed O(n 2.5 / log n). In order to see the problem consider the case when the input graph is a split graph with an equitable partition.…”
Section: Algorithms For Random Perfect Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perfect graphs can be recognised in polynomial time [2,3], and there are many NP-hard problems which are solvable in polynomial time for perfect graphs, including the stable set problem, the clique problem, the colouring problem, the clique covering problem and their weighted versions [4]. If the input graph is restricted to be a generalised split graph, then there are much more efficient algorithms for the problems above [5]. In this paper we address the problem of efficiently recognising generalised split graphs, and finding a witnessing partition.…”
Section: Definition and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Determining if a graph G contains a perfect code is NP-complete, even for many restricted classes of graphs, such as planar graphs with maxi¬mum degree three [43,24] and many others [23]. Efficient algorithms exists to determine if some classes of graphs contain a perfect code: trees [24], circular-arc graphs [41], and others [14,45].…”
Section: Perfect Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%