[1992] Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision
DOI: 10.1109/acv.1992.240299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for a fast confocal optical inspection system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is a relatively new optical tool for noninvasive evaluation of microstructures of foods and other materials. The primary value of the CLSM lies in its ability to make a series of observations (2‐D layered images) within a 3‐D specimen by focusing at different heights of the specimen, in a process called optical slicing (Rao and others 1992). The specimen can be illuminated and imaged through a pinhole to remove out‐of‐focus light, thus producing a clearer image (Kaláb and others 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is a relatively new optical tool for noninvasive evaluation of microstructures of foods and other materials. The primary value of the CLSM lies in its ability to make a series of observations (2‐D layered images) within a 3‐D specimen by focusing at different heights of the specimen, in a process called optical slicing (Rao and others 1992). The specimen can be illuminated and imaged through a pinhole to remove out‐of‐focus light, thus producing a clearer image (Kaláb and others 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLSM, on the other hand, is a noncontact method for quantitative measurement of surface roughness. The main advantage of CLSM is that it can construct a 3-D image by layering a series of 2-D images through a process called optical slicing (31). The laser beam in CLSM can penetrate into a thick sample and collect structural information at different depths without damaging the sample (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%