2002
DOI: 10.17487/rfc3279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile

Abstract: Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure for the certification request's and BGPsec UPDATE message's signature field MUST be as specified in Section 2.2.3 of [RFC3279].…”
Section: Signature Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure for the certification request's and BGPsec UPDATE message's signature field MUST be as specified in Section 2.2.3 of [RFC3279].…”
Section: Signature Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authentication certificates are X.509 [2] certificates, as profiled by RFCs 3279 [5], 5280 [11], and 4055 [6].…”
Section: Fingerprint Attributementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This syntax extends the BNF syntax of SDP [8]. specified in Section 8, allows for the addition of future tokens, but they may only be added if they are included in RFCs that update or obsolete RFC 3279 [5].…”
Section: Fingerprint Attributementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BNF grammar for each encoding rule is given below along with the OpenSSL routine used for the encoding in the reference implementation. The object identifiers for the encryption algorithms and message digest/ signature encryption schemes are specified in [RFC3279]. The particular algorithms required for conformance are not specified in this memo.…”
Section: Iana Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%